Pick Griffin at 4 or BPA or Trade down
Newsflash, we're not going to the Super Bowl next year. So my strategy is based on the continuation of a push to serious stability and then Super Bowl contention.
This will only be Heckert's third draft.
First draft landed us:
Haden (Impact starter)
Ward (Impact starter)
Hardesty (Jury is still out)
McCoy (Starter, tough kid, good pedigree, Jury still out)
Lauvao (Starter, or excellent depth at G)
No 4th Round pick
Assante (lost on Roster shuffle to TB)
Mitchell (6th round fail)
Geathers (6th round fail)
2nd Draft Landed us:
Browns traded 6th pick to ATL for 27, 59, & 124 in 2011 as well as 22 & 117 in 2012. Browns then traded 2011 27 & 70 for #21.
Taylor (Impact Starter)
Sheard (Impact Starter)
Little (Impact starter, led league in rookie receptions despite drops)
Cameron (West Coast needs LOTS of TEs, jury out on 4th rounder)
Marecic (We'd view him differently if we hadn't let our last FB go)
Skrine (Excellent 5th round value, Great cover & zone DB)
Pinkston (Great 5th round value, Learning & Strong)
Haag (7th rounder, finished STRONG last 6 games last year)
This year we draft 4, 22, 37, 68, 100, 118, 131, & 194.
We're not going to win the Super Bowl next year. Or the year after. But if we draft well this year and next we might just compete for one by 2014. That's what this is about. I want the Cleveland Browns to play in a Superbowl in the next five years. Keep value and add depth longterm. Build through young talent & depth. Stop with the "savior" bullshit and give me talent at all positions.
This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.
342 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is Heckert’s third BROWNS draft. He started January 2, 2006 in Philly and I’ll assume he started drafting at the 2006 NFL draft. His drafts prior are as follows:
2006:
1: 14th overall: DT Broderick Bunkley
2: 39th overall: OT Winston Justice
3: 71st overall: LB Chris Gocong
4: 99th overall: G Max Jean-Giles
4: 109th overall: WR Jason Avant
5: 147th overall: WR Jeremy Bloom
5: 168th overall: LB Omar Gaither
6: 204th overall: DT LaJuan Ramsey
2007:
2: 36th overall: QB Kevin Kolb
2: 57th overall: DE Victor Abiamiri
3: 87th overall: LB Stewart Bradley
3: 90th overall: RB Tony Hunt
5: 159th overall: CB C.J. Gaddis
5: 162nd overall: TE Brent Celek
6: 201st overall: CB Rashad Barksdale
7: 236th overall: RB Nate Iloa
2008:
2: 47th overall: DT Trevor Laws
2: 49th overall: WR Desean Jackson
3: 80th overall: DE Bryan Smith
4: 109th overall: G Mike McGlynn
4: 117th overall: S Quintin Demps
4: 131st overall: CB Jack Ikegwuonu
6: 184th overall: OT Mike Gibson
6: 200th overall: LB Joe Mays
6: 203rd overall: DE Andy Studebaker
7: 230th overall: OT King Dunlap
2009:
1: 19th overall: WR Jeremy Maclin
2: 53rd overall: RB LeSean McCoy
5:153rd overall: TE Cornelius Ingram
5: 157th overall: CB: Macho Harris
5: 159th overall: OT Fenuki Tupou
6: 194th overall: WR Brandon Gibson
7: 213th overall: G Paul Fanaika
7: 230th overall: LB Moise Fokou
Of all these 9 still remain with the team.
"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown
9 still remain on the team, but he had some good picks. Celek in the 5th? Shady at 53? macho harris and fokou are solid players. Avant is also a great value.
Interesting thing is in his 4th year, he drafted a QB with their first pick DESPITE having mcnabb.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
Shady at 53
I may have said this in another post but I’m reminded of it every time LeSean McCoy gets mentioned.
“And with the 52nd pick of the 2009 NFL draft the Cleveland Browns select….
David frikkin’ Veikune."
by Mal Reynolds on Feb 11, 2012 9:59 AM EST up reply actions
I would look at how many are still in the league. Also Kolb got them a pretty nice booty. I think hitting on 33% is pretty good for the draft, especially since 3-4 of those guys are pretty elite.
I believe you are right, 33% is good, especially since I recently read somewhere (don’t remember where since I read so damn many different places, lol) that 1st round draft choices had a 45% success rate, meaning they became starters. First round QB’s had a 41% chance of success and the percentages went down in each successive round. So, 33% is pretty darn good.
by OldTimeDawg on Feb 11, 2012 10:16 PM EST up reply actions
I would look at how many are still in the league.
this is the much more relevant measure.
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 13, 2012 6:36 PM EST up reply actions
Heckert proved his drafting skills in 1997. Jimmy Johnson drafted Yatil Green, WR from Miami (who, why?), in the 1st rd. Heckert, a scout for the dolphins, convinced JJ to take S.Madison because future HOFer, J.Taylor would ‘still’ be there in the 3rd. Been advising in drafts more and more, since then. In ‘99 Heckert was promoted to asst director of personnel. Director in ’00 before going to the Eagles in ’01 with same title.
I’d be willing to bet Heckert was responsible for a large number of eagles picks from ‘01-’05 as well.
Pretty certain, 2010 is his first at making the final decisions. “Except on QBs”, Holmgrens’ keeping that for himself. Heckert had 2 more promotions ($$$) in Philly but Reid always had the final say.
"...and Dawggone it, people like me".
"Except on QBs", Holmgrens’ keeping that for himself.
Source? I know Holmgren overruled him on McCoy, but since then he has been adamant that it’s Heckert’s show.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2012 10:41 AM EST up reply actions
I know Holmgren overruled him on McCoy
That’s a myth. Heckert has said repeatedly that McCoy was the highest person on the draft board when he was taken. There was a DT ahead of him who Mangini & Heckert were set to take, and Holmgren was apparently having second thoughts about that, but then the Falcons took him a few picks ahead of McCoy so that issue was moot.
Once you start comparing a QB to Drew Brees, you've lost the argument.
by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 13, 2012 1:21 PM EST up reply actions
That DT, Corey Peters, has turned out to be a pretty good player for Atlanta.
Heckert knows good players.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 13, 2012 1:42 PM EST up reply actions
Well there you go then, mystery solved.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2012 6:12 PM EST up reply actions
Still, if Holmgren wanted to ascend and make Heckert pick a guy, he could.
But he doesn’t. Just like he didn’t try to tell Mangini how to coach. Holmgren hires the right people and lets them do what they do, while setting the big-picture course for the franchise.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
Just wanted to point out that Heckert’s role in PHI was a lot different than what he has in Cleveland. In PHI he was regularly overruled by his HC. In PHI the only one that can overrule him is Holmgren and the only instance of this is the McCoy pick.
by gentryholdem on Feb 13, 2012 9:31 PM EST up reply actions
Stop with the “savior” bullshit and give me talent at all positions.
Stop with the “I want 8 average fill-ins” bullshit and give me a 1st round QB who has a chance of actually leading us deep into the playoffs.
Resident Tim Couch Apologist.
RG3 isn’t that guy…. Luck could only fill those shoes
by lightninmcqueen on Feb 10, 2012 8:58 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
What brand of crystal ball are you using?
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
by rufio on Feb 11, 2012 1:27 AM EST up reply actions 4 recs
Madam Ruby brand Crystal Balls

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Unless Griffin is as good as Tom Brady or Peyton Manning that’s not going to happen, and everyone should know that by now. We certainly need as much All-Pro talent as we can possess, but 99% of the time one player isn’t going to take us deep in the playoffs.
Honor. Courage. Commitment.
by Brownsbacker488 on Feb 10, 2012 10:31 PM EST up reply actions
RGIII doesn’t have to play like Brady or Manning to be successful. Even if he just added a spark to the offense (similar to how Newton put some life into what was previously an awful Carolina offense) I would enjoy watching games more and have some hope and excitement for the future knowing we had a real NFL QB with potential to be elite with time, development, and an improved surrounding cast.
99% of the time, teams that go deep into the playoffs have a 1st round, superstar QB. We currently do not.
Resident Tim Couch Apologist.
Fine, it isn’t 99%, but it’s significant. SB winning QBs:
SB 46 – Eli Manning (1st rd.)
SB 45 – Aaron Rogers (1st rd.)
SB 44 – Drew Brees (first pick in 2nd rd.)
SB 43 – Ben Roethlisberger (1st rd.)
SB 42 – Eli Manning (1st rd.)
SB 41 – Peyton Manning (1st rd.)
SB 40 – Ben Roethlisberger (1st rd.)
SB 39 – Tom Brady (exception to rule)
SB 38 – Tom Brady (exception to rule)
SB 37 – Brad Johnson (late rounds)
SB 36 – Tom Brady (exception to rule)
SB 35 – Trent Dilfer (1st rd.)
SB 34 – Kurt Warner (undrafted)
SB 33 – John Elway (1st rd.)
SB 32 – John Elway (1st rd.)
SB 31 – Brett Favre (early 2nd rd.)
SB 30 – Troy Aikman (1st rd.)
SB 29 – Steve Young (1st rd., supplemental)
SB 28 – Troy Aikman (1st rd.)
SB 27 – Troy Aikman (1st rd.)
So in the last 20 Super Bowls, 15 of the winning QBs have been either 1st rounders or very high 2nd rounders, 3 others were Tom Brady, who is clearly a rare find in late rounds. That leaves 2, Brad Johnson and Kurt Warner.
Amongst the losing QBs in those games are some of the guys already mentioned as winners of other SBs, and a few other 1st rounders.
I don’t know what else you want.
Resident Tim Couch Apologist.
by Dawg Nuts on Feb 11, 2012 11:18 PM EST up reply actions 7 recs
So what you’re saying is if you want a successful future you can make a good investment with a reasonable expectation of return or buy a lottery ticket.
Lots of lottery tickets.
If you would take these numbers and then also look at the numbers of QBs drafted by round, you would see a very, very strong correlation between successful QBs and being drafted high.
There are a ton of undrafted QBs who get into the NFL, and there is only one Kurt Warner out of all of them.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
And one Tony Romo and the rest are matt moores.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
This is actually a very good point. Matt Moore has already far exceeded any reasonable expectations.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 2:00 AM EST up reply actions
Holy shit Dilfer was a first rounder?
Where taking the BROWNS to the SUPERBOWL is not a joke,but a life's passion!
by ctowndawgpound on Feb 12, 2012 5:09 PM EST up reply actions
Him and Shuler were the top QBs that year. I used to collect their football cards.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 5:20 PM EST up reply actions
Yo Dawg,
The one thing I see in that list is those are almost ALL pocket passers. None of them are pure athletes. All of them are pocket passers with the absolute exception of Steve Young and the minor exception of Roethlisberger (big brusier breaking tackles and scrambling.)
RG3 is 6’2 6’3 220. Basically we’d have a 2" taller 20 pound heavier version of Vick. If the hype plays out. Can he win on grass? Better yet can the Browns switch to synthetic turf like Ohio States field? Because if we’re going to make it work with RG3 in Cleveland we better not have turf issues.
by gentryholdem on Feb 13, 2012 9:07 PM EST up reply actions
I think its been fairly well established that Griffin can play from the pocket if given time and runs if he needs to. Baylor’s O Line was a joke.
Needs to? He would never need to, the man can literally outrun everyone.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
Griffin is a pocket passer who can run when he needs to. He’s a much better passer than Vick.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 15, 2012 10:46 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah, he’s looked really good in the nfl so far.
by FrenchToast979 on Feb 15, 2012 2:08 PM EST up reply actions
What?
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 16, 2012 9:06 AM EST up reply actions
Vick threw a pretty damn good ball in college but was mainly drafted for his speed. Griffin beats Vick in both aspects.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 15, 2012 2:33 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry, I meant as a college prospects. I would draft Griffin over college Vick if they were both coming out this year.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 15, 2012 4:07 PM EST up reply actions
I do think people take this too far as well. Baylor ran inverted veer and play action off of it. His running ability was utilized to help that offense go.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
That’s true, but it’s pretty obvious he was a pass-first player.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 16, 2012 9:06 AM EST up reply actions
When he was asked to drop back, yes. He kept his eyes downfield and tried to find open guys while buying time instead of taking off immediately looking to advance the ball himself.
But the offense was designed partially around Griffin’s running ability—or at worst the threat of him running. And honestly, I would hope any NFL offense he plays in will feature him in this capacity at least a little bit. But in any event, you see those run fakes setting up some of his highlight passes. So I am uncomfortable with “pass-first player.” From what I’ve read their offense was based on ball-controll passes, while working in those shotgun QB options and then PA off of those option plays. So “pass-first offense” I am more comfortable with.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
One side of the arguement is ‘1st round QBs get to the Superbowl’.
The other, less popular, side is ‘more 1st rounders do NOT get there’. A lot of ’em dont even get close.
Those that do, are usually mid to late 1st rd.
"...and Dawggone it, people like me".
The other, less popular, side is ‘more 1st rounders do NOT get there’
And even fewer guys from other rounds get there. What is your point? Yes, most QBs drafted into the NFL never reach the superbowl. But your odds are much higher with a first round guy. If I offered you two lottery tickets, one with a 40% chance to win and one with a 3% chance to win, which would you take?
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2012 10:43 AM EST up reply actions
The other, less popular, side is ‘more 1st rounders do NOT get there’. A lot of ’em dont even get close.
Wow. You need to learn something about probabilities and basic, basic statistics.
Once you start comparing a QB to Drew Brees, you've lost the argument.
by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 13, 2012 1:22 PM EST up reply actions
The other, less popular, side is ‘more 1st rounders do NOT get there’. A lot of ’em dont even get close.

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 13, 2012 1:45 PM EST up reply actions
I agree with you in a way. People seem to think that if we draft Griffin, we cannot add anything else to the team. We’d still have FA, more picks this year and next, and next years FA and all the following years. I don’t really want Griffin, but I agree with the fact that we need somebody soon, if not now. It’d take three picks, maybe four for Griffin, one of which is extra anyway.
"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown
by macdowellm03 on Feb 10, 2012 10:35 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t want “8 average fill-ins.” I never said that. I want impact starters at all positions. You do that through the draft. You don’t pull a Washington or Atlanta and trade away 2 and 3 starters for 1 guy.
YOU PICK RIGHT! Sometimes you sign through free agency.
by gentryholdem on Feb 13, 2012 9:34 PM EST up reply actions
You don’t pull a Washington or Atlanta and trade away 2 and 3 starters for 1 guy.
You do if it’s for a QB. Ask the Giants.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 13, 2012 9:53 PM EST up reply actions
You’ve got the situation reversed. We don’t give up 2-3 first & second rounders to move up a few spots for RGIII. You do that for Andrew Luck.
by gentryholdem on Feb 17, 2012 7:25 PM EST up reply actions
How’s the situation reversed?
The Giants gave up two firsts (Merriman and Rivers) a 3rd (Nate Kaeding) and a 5th (ended up being Jerome Collins) for the better QB.
Do you think anyone in NY is pissed about that? Think there are some Charger fans that wish that they would have held onto Manning?
You always go after the QB. Always.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 18, 2012 12:00 PM EST up reply actions
what is more often than always? b/c that is how often you go after the qb.
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 18, 2012 3:27 PM EST up reply actions
Great pedigree? By whom? the ass who threw the Browns trainers under the bus? Screw the McCoys and their whiny, excuse making followers. Get us a QB and let the rest of the pieces fall into place.
Funny, his followers include Holmgren and Heckert. Keep drinking the Kool-aid.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 10:05 PM EST up reply actions
Really? You seem to be confusing a 3rd round stop gap, the best choice in that draft with a franchise QB. If he was a franchise QB he would be named the starter next year and we wouldn’t be talking about this.
by HenryDawg on Feb 10, 2012 11:00 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
Really.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 11:06 PM EST up reply actions
Let’s face it. He was drafted as a project, was forced to start due to injuries, showed some promise and so got the nod for the next year, but didn’t really show much promise by the end of the season. Maybe HH&S have seen something to lead them to believe that he can be the guy, but if it’s there it’s hasn’t been visible to the general public.
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
I have the best wife - ever.
It is not just invisible to the general public, the entire world of football analysis says that Colt McCoy is average. Or maybe I’m wrong. Is there a respected voice out there, coach, former coach, some one whose views have been sound over the years, who says the Browns ought to stick with McCoy?
by JamesPowell on Feb 10, 2012 11:16 PM EST up reply actions
I remember what this guy could do with receivers. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21Tda-n108s That voice is H&H.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 11:18 PM EST up reply actions
I went through about half of that video and all I see is Colt throwing to wide open receivers that the terrible Big 12 defenses cannot cover, and Colt breaking poor college tackling.
"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown
by macdowellm03 on Feb 10, 2012 11:25 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, me too.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 11:27 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t get it, weren’t you defending McCoy? This video makes him look rather pedestrian.
"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown
by macdowellm03 on Feb 10, 2012 11:28 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah…pedestrian with receivers who can actually get YAC and TDs.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 11:34 PM EST up reply actions
That means that he isn’t that good
"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown
by macdowellm03 on Feb 11, 2012 12:28 AM EST up reply actions
Now that is really subjective and depends on his supporting cast as well….or am I out in left field?
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 12:30 AM EST up reply actions
So if I’m reading this right, you’re saying if Colt gets good receivers he has a chance to be pedestrian.
That’s what we’re shooting for? Neat.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Feb 11, 2012 12:31 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Pedestrian with good receivers and a decent pass rush could get us to the playoffs. But I was being sarcastic, I don’t see those highlights as pedestrian by any means. The throws were there on target.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 12:39 PM EST up reply actions
Pedestrian with good receivers and a decent pass rush could get us to the playoffs.
Based on what?
Mediocre QB play gets you beat in the playoffs gets you beat every single time.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 11, 2012 8:21 PM EST up reply actions
We don’t have a mediocre QB. Here again, all I can say is we’ll see.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 8:57 PM EST up reply actions
What exactly is better than “mediocre” about 57.2% completion, 14:11 TD:INT, 5.9 YPA, 4.7 ANY/A, and a 74.6 QB rating?
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
How about throwing INT’s running to his right?
He does that better that average.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 12, 2012 3:57 PM EST up reply actions
Big Ben was far from mediocre in his first SB win.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
The refs were the MVPs of that game.
by HenryDawg on Feb 13, 2012 4:37 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
So I guess the Browns need to get Quan Cosby and Nate Jones and we’ll be all set
by JamesPowell on Feb 10, 2012 11:33 PM EST up reply actions
Off the top of my head, Jim Zorn and Curt Warner both were in Mccoy’s corner.
by OldTimeDawg on Feb 11, 2012 10:24 PM EST up reply actions
Curt Warner
I’m a Penn State guy, but I don’t trust the opinion of a 51 yr. old former RB on our starting QB.
Resident Tim Couch Apologist.
by Dawg Nuts on Feb 11, 2012 11:20 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
No offense, I appreciate your service, but how many games did you watch him play this year? You’re probably not in a position to comment other than pure emotion.
Well then Bradford sucks too right? He put up worse numbers than McCoy this year.
Yes im a troll. Yes I hate everyone. Yes I like Colt McCoy. Yes Im 4 years old. Yes I get butt hurt. Deal with it.
LOL. Right.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 8:55 PM EST up reply actions
H&H’s support for McCoy ranges all the way from lukewarm to tepid.
Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war
by Kaner on Feb 10, 2012 10:28 PM EST reply actions 4 recs
I always get bombarded with this…“prove what you mean”.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 10:33 PM EST up reply actions
H&H’s support publicly is the only thing that it can be. They like him. If they say anything else they risk giving away what their plans are.
"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown
by macdowellm03 on Feb 10, 2012 10:39 PM EST up reply actions
Ever stop to think that the only “smokescreen” is the competition? And that they actually like the QB they have?
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 10:41 PM EST up reply actions
I didn’t say “smokescreen.” I meant they wanted not to give anything away. A smokescreen is intentionally making it look like you are doing the opposite of what are actually going to do so that the competition does things around your fake plan. I think they do like him but that means nothing.
"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown
by macdowellm03 on Feb 10, 2012 10:44 PM EST up reply actions
I know you didn’t. When I say smokescreen I relate it to Cleveland fans calling for McCoys head when the FO still believes he can get it done. So they throw out a “competition” knowing full well that they are going to coach him up and he will start this year. “Publicly” they don’t want backlash.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 10:50 PM EST up reply actions
I see what you mean, but that competition will not be Griffin if that is true, because we can’t give those picks away if we are staying with McCoy anyway.
"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown
by macdowellm03 on Feb 10, 2012 10:58 PM EST up reply actions
So you’re saying yourself then that they’ve never come out in support of Colt as “the guy.”
Steel Nick
I think the presser said it all if you can read between the lines.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 12:43 PM EST up reply actions
You mean the part where they said next year will be a competition instead of sticking with the guy they named the starter this year? That ringing endorsement?
Crazy how you can pick through the debris but everyone else they’re trying to fool can’t.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Feb 11, 2012 2:34 PM EST up reply actions 6 recs
Sorry, i’ll just drink the kool-aid too. Yea!….the front office IS taking RG3!!!!
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 12, 2012 12:40 AM EST up reply actions
I think you’re completely missing the point. The point here isn’t that we think the front office is in love with RG3. The point is they are decidedly not in love with McCoy.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 2:01 AM EST up reply actions
Mike Holmgren stated he did love McCoy. I don’t think i’m missing anything. I’m not trying to be a dick. I’m trying to temper expectations. The RG3 madness is just that….madness.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 12, 2012 2:09 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
did he use the word “love”? If he did…awww, how cute!
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
Can you present a single positive thing that could come out of H&H stating right now that Colt hasn’t panned out and that they’re looking for a QB? Seriously, name one good thing that would happen by them doing that.
Resident Tim Couch Apologist.
I haven’t read a single statement from the FO that says they are looking for a QB. They said we have young players we believe in and the will be a competition. Where in the world does that imply we are bringing anyone else in?
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 13, 2012 7:59 AM EST up reply actions
NM…read that wrong.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 13, 2012 8:10 AM EST up reply actions
This entire line of comments has had nothing to do with Griffin. He is irrelevant here.
If the team loved Colt McCoy, there wouldn’t be a QB competition next year.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 10:14 AM EST up reply actions
they need to talk.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
It’s not him, it’s Pat.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions
Lol. This.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 12, 2012 7:14 PM EST up reply actions
“Like McCoy” is enough for me. I dont believe the FO is “in love” with RG3 either. May be benificial to let people believe it if they want to tho.
"...and Dawggone it, people like me".
I dont believe the FO is "in love" with RG3 either.
Why not? Remember, we aren’t saying they love the guy or not. You’re the one making that claim.
"Like McCoy" is enough for me.
Front offices like guys that they cut, too. Liking a guy doesn’t mean they think he’s a starter.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2012 10:45 AM EST up reply actions
The front office has less than zero incentive to come out and say exactly what they think about any draft prospect right now.
And what the FO thinks about players should have little influence on how we think about them. We are allowed to second-guess their evaluations.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
You are being ridiculous.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
Well then I deserve the ridicule.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 12, 2012 7:30 PM EST up reply actions
Seriously man. You should take a break.
Once you start comparing a QB to Drew Brees, you've lost the argument.
by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 13, 2012 1:23 PM EST up reply actions
Just for you….I didn’t mean to be harsh but this is the second place I read it. See ya in a month? Is that long enough? Naa…i’ll go til we draft.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 13, 2012 3:26 PM EST up reply actions
There saying, ‘Could be’. That’s all you get with RG3 as well.
"...and Dawggone it, people like me".
Just because neither is guaranteed doesn’t mean they have the same risk.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2012 10:46 AM EST up reply actions
We’ll see.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 11:02 PM EST up reply actions
Ever stop to think that the only "smokescreen" is the competition? And that they actually like the QB they have?
What would be the benefit of them doing this? If they liked him, they would say that he is their guy. Period-point-blank.
The reason they are non-committal to the press about him is simple. If they can get something better, they will. If they can’t, they don’t want to bash the kid and make the player, the team and the fans realize that they “settled” for another year of Colt.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 11, 2012 8:25 PM EST up reply actions
The only reason I can think of is the vocal Browns fan base.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 8:54 PM EST up reply actions
Then we would have the world’s dumbest front office.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 11, 2012 8:58 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Prove that. Why?
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 8:58 PM EST up reply actions
That the only reason my front office is not naming Colt McCoy “the guy” is because of the fan base?
What is there to prove? That would be the dumbest line of thinking. I really hope, and I believe, that this front office doesn’t give a rat’s rear about what the fans think about what they are doing.
They didn’t care when they hired a complete unknown in Shurmur, but now they care what the fans think about naming Colt McCoy starter? How does this make any sense?
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 11, 2012 9:00 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
Well, this is just a theory, but our fan base can be very vocal. If you want to avoid controversy call for a competition. I thought I explained it well enough earlier.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 9:28 PM EST up reply actions
If you want to avoid controversy, call for a competition.
The last half of that sentence is at odds with the first half of that sentence.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Feb 11, 2012 9:52 PM EST via Android app up reply actions 4 recs
On the field, it’s a competition. In the stands, it’s a controversy. Maybe the fans’ need to change their views.
"...and Dawggone it, people like me".
How have you convinced yourself of this?
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Feb 13, 2012 3:10 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
The yoga that Colt defenders go through to support him as the best option is pretty remarkable. But frankly, if you’re in that camp the burden of proof is on you. Since Colt’s first snap in the NFL, I don’t see how you can construct enough evidence to support his ability to play QB at this level. “We don’t know because of his supporting cast” is NOT an argument in his favor. It is at best ambivalent, and if that’s the best you can do then you have already lost.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Feb 11, 2012 10:00 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
The burden of proof has nothing to do with me or any of us.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 10:05 PM EST up reply actions
What I’m saying is, if you think Colt McCoy is a good quarterback in the NFL, YOU are the one who needs to support that statement because nothing on the field backs it up. If I say Colt McCoy is not a good QB in the NFL I can let his results speak for themselves.
Steel Nick
I really don’t. The FO likes him…that’s all I need.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 12, 2012 7:23 PM EST up reply actions
Fine, how about this: Show me the FO likes him, without using “read between the lines” in your answer. Don’t INFER it, show me.
Steel Nick
Read the press conference transcriphttp://www.clevelandbrowns.com/news/article-1/Holmgren-Heckert-press-conf-transcript—-15/b7a8f9e6-ff9c-42bb-86dc-0e76fa77dd62t,
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 12, 2012 8:29 PM EST up reply actions
Nice, I just clicked my own link and it’s expired. I swear it was there earlier.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 12, 2012 10:48 PM EST up reply actions
You and others, may think there’s ‘enough evidence to give up on McCoy’, but there are more of us that ‘want to see more before making that quick decision’.
It’s not about supporting cast as much as it is about learning a new offense and playing ‘under center’. RG3 will need a year or two as well.
So you gonna give up on RG3 in ’12, ’13 or ’14?
"...and Dawggone it, people like me".
but there are more of us that ‘want to see more before making that quick decision’.
21 starts is no longer a “quick” decision.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 13, 2012 1:49 PM EST up reply actions
Well, then I guess the two I mentioned above (Zorn and Warner) are using that argument. Now, I’m not a Colt apologist, however, I am in the camp that we don’t go for RGlll, if anything, let him come to us at #4. If he and Blackmon are gone, we either trade down or go with Claiborne. So, that argument works for me and two ex-QB’s. I’ll take that stand, lol.
by OldTimeDawg on Feb 11, 2012 10:41 PM EST up reply actions
If they think RGIII is the guy, then they need to move to get him. NOt any any cost, but at reasonable cast. The Browns can pay a reasonable cost and still have a decent draft.
The only thing necessary to remain in the cellar is for H&H to do nothing.
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
I have the best wife - ever.
They actually don’t do shit, they blame the rest of the team or make vague statements about his college career or make stupid attempts to link him to Alex Smith or Eli Manning. Suggesting they actually make the attempt or effort on the level of yoga is giving them too much credit.
people come up with the theory, but any FO that isn’t going to go with their gut and instead, pander to fans is dumb. I don’t take Heckert to be an idiot.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
I doubt Holmgren is pissing his pants whenever Dawg Pound Mike says he’s upset.
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
I have the best wife - ever.
by JustBob on Feb 12, 2012 10:43 AM EST up reply actions 5 recs
Maybe with laughter.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions
This thread is filled with a bunch of crap already.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 11:01 PM EST reply actions 4 recs
Buuuuhhh
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 11:01 PM EST up reply actions
Yeeeaaahhhh, you shouldn’t say that to me.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 11:06 PM EST up reply actions
What should I say then?
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 11:07 PM EST up reply actions
Buh.
"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown
by macdowellm03 on Feb 10, 2012 11:25 PM EST up reply actions
I didn’t want to but on behalf of all previous posters….are we are crap?
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 11:26 PM EST up reply actions
or
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 11:28 PM EST up reply actions
I was talking about the sh*t that has been non-stop been being discussed on this site.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 11:29 PM EST up reply actions
I’m cool with that….lott’o crap til the draft I expect.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 11:31 PM EST up reply actions
All these fanposts are friggin’ killing me. They’re all the same damn question.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 11:34 PM EST up reply actions
Me too brother…just had some fight in me tonight.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 11:35 PM EST up reply actions
Let’s go!
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 11:40 PM EST up reply actions
The year before last, I got a tripps pack of Brown’s tickets. I saw them plat the Panthers, Falcons and Patriots. I was thinking if I got a tripps pack again this year, I would have a Browns essay contest for one of the games on DBN. Take one of my DBN fellowship to the game. Cool or stupid?
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 10, 2012 11:44 PM EST up reply actions
The posters aren’t crap, the posts are. There’s a huge difference.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 11, 2012 12:19 AM EST up reply actions
Can I ask which ones?
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 12:25 AM EST up reply actions
It would be quicker to list the ones that aren’t crap.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 11, 2012 11:47 AM EST up reply actions
I know what you mean. I was confusing comments and posts.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 11:59 AM EST up reply actions
Wait. You list Lauvao as a potential starter. I thought he was supposed to be one of the weakest links on that line. I’m sure it didn’t help playing next to Hicks/cousins/Broken Pashos, but I wasn’t aware that he had done anything that would warrant him starting without an injury ahead of him in the depth chart.
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
I have the best wife - ever.
He really didn’t do that bad. Flat out starter, no. But he has a lot of starting experience and he can fill the role. Needs to cut off his penalties though.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 11:09 PM EST up reply actions
I like him as a backup, and I wouldn’t really mind to much if he was a starter next year, but I think he’s the weakest link on the line.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 11, 2012 12:20 AM EST up reply actions
Uhh man, this is tuff. I like the kid. He works hard. I really don’t have a problem with him starting.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 11, 2012 4:33 AM EST up reply actions
Uhh man, this is tuff. I like the kid. He works hard. I really don’t have a problem with him starting.
Agreed. As a 3rd round pick he’s a good player/value to hold down the RG position until an upgrade can be made and could possibly develop into very good (I think Pinkston could too). I don’t recall too many instances of seeing him get flat out beat and/or consistently dominated throughout a game. It’s also hard for my untrained eye to tell which times the issue were his execution or more miscommunication with the revolving door to his right, both of which can be improved.
Haven’t really looked but I don’t think there’s a Jahri Evans type interior OL on the FA market and this probably isn’t the draft where we take an OG in Rds 1-2.
by Mal Reynolds on Feb 11, 2012 10:38 AM EST up reply actions
agreed.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
Too many stupid penalties
Yes im a troll. Yes I hate everyone. Yes I like Colt McCoy. Yes Im 4 years old. Yes I get butt hurt. Deal with it.
yes, but he was still a nice player besides that. Why I’d rather have him as a backkup
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
I’ve said it all season and I’ll say it again here; he’s got the physical tools, he just makes too many mistakes in determining/executing his assignments properly. The penalties don’t help.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
he has a lot of starting experience
I can see some merit to that, and maybe with an offseason and a bit of coaching he can get better. I’m certainly not the final word in judging O-line talent. But if I wanted to sea lawyer you I could point out that St. Clair had a lot of starting experience.
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
I have the best wife - ever.
by JustBob on Feb 10, 2012 11:15 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
OK talent….
Blackmon
Mercilus
Sanders
Iloka
Streeter
Foles
Posey
Carder
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 1:26 AM EST reply actions
I thought u did.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 8:53 PM EST up reply actions
How bout the rest?
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 9:30 PM EST up reply actions
Like Blackmon, just not for us. Don’t know what Sanders you listed. Iloka looks okay, haven’t watched him enough yet to be firm with him. Don’t like Foles.
I think Posey can play at the next level, would be a steal in the third. Like Tank Carder, think he will be a very good pro for a long time. Won’t make a ton of splash plays but will rack up tackles and be a solid defender. Probably will slide because the dreaded “lack of athleticism” tag.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 11, 2012 9:36 PM EST up reply actions
Zebrie Sanders. I know Foles is a reach but if we are stuck….the more the merrier.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 9:51 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t think he is a good enough of an athlete to ever be an impact-level pass rusher. When I watch him, it seems like a lot of his pressures are from his “don’t quit” going after the passer. Seems to get high at times making him much easier to control. His motor is a definite plus. I think he will be okay, but never sniffing 10 sacks a season.
Honestly, I don’t like him in the second round.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 12, 2012 3:54 PM EST up reply actions
Oh man, if we can’t get RG3 or Blackmon I would try to swap with Seattle and take him at 12. I think he’ll be gone soon after that if not earlier. People are comparing him to JPP and any DE with a high motor and reasonable athleticism is a nightmare for QBs and his athleticism is pretty high from what I’ve read. Dream draft would be Griffin then Mercilus but I doubt he’s there at 22 (if we still have it)
JPP had freakish size and athleticism and not much refinement. I haven’t watched Mercilus much but if he had those things to go along with his stats he’d be a top 10 pick.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
mercilus is an inch shorter and about 15 pounds lighter. I think Ingram has that DE/DT size and could weigh in close to 280 (and still do great in drills) but doesn’t have that elite JPP arm length.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
best thing about him is his last name
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 14, 2012 1:26 PM EST up reply actions
I think we should steal Mr. Peabody’s WABAC Machine and trade all of our draft picks for the rights to Spergon Wynn.
"We just lost to the Steelers 20 hours ago and that still hurts. I need to get home and eat a burrito." -Phil Dawson
Man, that takes me back. I wanna watch Underdog, Rocky and Bullwinkle and Hong Kong Phooey now.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 10:17 AM EST up reply actions
you should start using the subject line and giving us two options for your post titles
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
The New Kardiad Kids: sarcasm or not?
Like this?
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 10:46 AM EST up reply actions
On the next pwnda-post: The Comeback Crusader -or- Facetious Jerkwad
you mustve never watched rocky and bullwinkle…
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
by pwndabear on Feb 11, 2012 10:55 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Lol. I totally missed the reference.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 10:59 AM EST up reply actions
That was a few braincells years ago.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 11:04 AM EST up reply actions
Btw, Facetious, sure. Jerkwad….not so much.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 1:54 PM EST up reply actions
Gotta be you.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 11, 2012 11:01 PM EST up reply actions
Neither? Both?
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 11:26 PM EST up reply actions
he scored a touchdown once for me in madden.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
i totally took the browns to the superbowl and won. and i dont mean that as a poop reference either.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
by pwndabear on Feb 11, 2012 11:07 AM EST up reply actions 4 recs
Today I took the Browns to the superbowl and won. and I do mean that as a poop reference.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
It would be terrible to lose.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 11, 2012 11:03 PM EST up reply actions
I lost once…
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
speaking of madden, anyone play for the 360?
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
yes, but don’t have live. Not worth the pay, especially since I am seriously considering switching systems.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
I sorta agree with this but when your whole team average is around 3.5 (I think), isn’t that also indicative of poor blocking schemes?
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
Well, hopefully with Chilly on board things won’t look so bleak with what we end up with player-wise.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 11, 2012 11:02 AM EST up reply actions
Steiny comes back, Luavo stays at RG and Pinkston moves over to RT. Line fixed.
What does that MEAN - TO PLAY US OUT?!!?!?
I’d rather have Pinkston at RG, Lauvao as a backup, and a 2nd/3rd round RT.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
I would bet Pinkston stays at LG, and Steinbach moves to the right. I do not know how many more years they want from Steinbach, but I do not see them moving their young G to make him learn the opposite side now and take away a young left side of the line in general of Thomas-Pinkston-Mack.
LG is very vital to pulling, as teams usually run more often to the right. Steiny is amazing at pulling and the Browns need him pulling to the right.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
Sorry for a repost, but in a same argument on another post I sent this out:
http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2011/04/23/help-wanted-cleveland-browns/
I know some are not huge into PFF, but they do not think highly of steinbach at all. I was trying to search for actual grading of him, but the only thing I found was his name in the "20 worst Madden Rankings." I was trying to find an article from Pluto referencing Steinbach too, because he has brought up this notion that Steinbach is not as good as everyone thinks as well.
Here’s a blurb about Steinbach in their "20 Worst Madden Rankings:"
3. Eric Steinbach, G, Cleveland (91). Steinbach was our 85th-ranked guard out of 86 last year, which is enough said. Steinbach was particularly poor at run blocking, and he gets a laughable score of 91 from Madden in run block — four points ahead of LT Joe Thomas! Thomas was the best run-blocker in the NFL last year, bar none, yet Madden sticks him with an 87 in run blocking. Absurd.
Needless to say, I think Steinbach is getting by on past reputation and not actual play now. I mean this points out his run blocking as bad- which is supposed to be his strength no?
Since my post to you was long, I will sum it up again.
He had a bad 2009 and they bash him once or twice before 2010, but he is not often mentioned as a bad player and doesn’t rank in their bottom 20 guards in Pass Pro, whereas he is in the bottom 20 between 2008-2010…pretty much all because of a horrendous, in their opinion, 2009. Take that away, and he is an above average pass blocker.
As a run blocker, I already showed how he had an impact in 2010.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
Steinbach hasn’t been getting by on actual play because he hasn’t been…actually playing.
If/when he’s healthy, he’ll be just fine for us at LG. He’s not getting younger, but he’s more than decent for now.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
Pinkston is not going to RT. Heckert flat out said that Pinkston and Steinbach are both G and would not move to RT. Heckert also flat out said at the time of the draft last year that Pinkston was drafted to be a G. I can point out whats not a smoke screen, and this my friends is definitely NOT a smoke screen. Pinkston is staying at G.
I think one of them would only move in an emergency situation, after several injuries.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
Doesn’t Greco have experience at tackle?
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 11, 2012 11:03 PM EST up reply actions
I have no idea.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
Apparently he does: http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2011/07/cleveland_browns_trade_for_ram.html
Also, note that this article mentions we would have owed St. Louis a pick if he became a starter. Perhaps that factored into his playing time.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 2:04 AM EST up reply actions
So we basically stole Greco from the Rams.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 2:18 AM EST up reply actions
Seems like it. Score one for Heckert.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 10:15 AM EST up reply actions
Ya, I saw that we did not have to end up giving the Rams a pick because Greco only played 1/2 a quarter this year… and that was the best the OL played all year. Isnt Greco going to be like 26 or 27? Maybe they have an answer for RG now…
I was very surprised he didn’t play more this season. If they thought enough of him to risk a draft pick, you would think they would have used him.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 3:29 PM EST up reply actions
Awesome.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
That has to be some smooth talking to get a team to freely hand over a depth player… of any calabur.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 4:11 PM EST up reply actions
I’m more positive than most (everyone?) on Hardesty. I am very excited to see what he can do this season two full years out from the ACL injury.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 11, 2012 8:28 PM EST up reply actions
I am in this camp. I am not expecting him to be amazing, but I think he’ll look solid. Also excited to see BJax.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
As much as I would love for a running back already under contract by the Browns to become legit, I honestly cannot get the least bit excited about Brandon Jackson and Montario Hardesty. I wish I could, but I really can’t.
I’m counting on Ogbanaya and Carlton Mitchell to break out.
by HenryDawg on Feb 11, 2012 11:48 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I’ve been telling everyone that I think the same about Carlton. Just hope that he doesn’t get caught in a numbers game.The injury last year really hurt his growth.
Where taking the BROWNS to the SUPERBOWL is not a joke,but a life's passion!
by ctowndawgpound on Feb 12, 2012 5:19 PM EST up reply actions
According to Pluto:
The Browns are hoping Carlton Mitchell can show something in the mini camps. Mitchell has the speed and physique (6-3, 220), but he’s battled injuries and inexperience.
http://www.cleveland.com/pluto/blog/index.ssf/2012/02/terry_plutos_talkin_about_colt.html
i expect pretty much zero out of hardesty. bjax i think could be productive.
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 14, 2012 2:21 PM EST up reply actions
Do you think he can start if Hillis is gone? Not too sure about that.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 11, 2012 9:38 PM EST up reply actions
I think he can, but I think any RB can be a starter.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 12, 2012 3:56 PM EST up reply actions
I worded that wrong. Of course any RB can start, but he probably won’t have the same impact that a Hillis brings. The running game drastically changes between the two.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 4:15 PM EST up reply actions
I think any RB can give you 90% of what elite RB’s give. If Hardesty is healthy, and that is far from a given, I think he will be just as good, if not better than Hillis.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 12, 2012 7:16 PM EST up reply actions
No way. Ogbonnaya was way better than Hardesty this year.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 9:42 PM EST up reply actions
OMGBanana?
"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown
by macdowellm03 on Feb 13, 2012 7:31 PM EST up reply actions
I think any RB can give you 90% of what elite RB’s give.
Absurd. You take this too far. I definitely agree with you that the marginal value of RBs between average and elite is not as large as for other positions — eg QB, DE, DT, CB, LT, etc — but this is just false. Any RB does not give you 90 percent of what AP gives you or even what a Matt Forte or Ray Rice give you.
Once you start comparing a QB to Drew Brees, you've lost the argument.
by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 13, 2012 1:26 PM EST up reply actions
In 2010, 90% of what Adrian Peterson gave was 1,000 yards rushing, 300 yards receiving and 12 TD’s.
Pretty much what BenJarvus Green-Ellis gave the Pats last season or Cedric Benson gave the Bengals, and those dudes are the definition of “Just another guy”.
RB’s are a waste of money. Just replace and go.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 13, 2012 1:55 PM EST up reply actions
Until you consider that every WC offensive coordinator salivates over Roger Craig videos. That is why I think the Browns might trade down and take Richardson. Honestly, he’s twice the overall talent that Peterson was coming out of Oklahoma. He has tremendous speed. He’s violently strong. He has above average ability to catch the ball out of the backfield. He’s a great blocker. Beast mode type of RB.
Just saying, the option to trade out of 4 and still take Richardson makes a lot of sense. And we still don’t know what we do with free agency. Or we take RG3 at 4 if he’s still there.
by gentryholdem on Feb 13, 2012 9:25 PM EST up reply actions
Honestly, he’s twice the overall talent that Peterson was coming out of Oklahoma.
No he isn’t. He wasn’t even the best RB on his team two years ago.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 13, 2012 9:53 PM EST up reply actions
THIS THIS THIS!!! He is nowhere near the level. He is the best prospect since AP, but that’s because dmc was overrated, and moreno might have been the next highest guy drafted at 11.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
I agree 100% with this.
McFadden was the best RB I have seen since Eric Dickerson. Yes, that includes AP.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 14, 2012 12:10 PM EST up reply actions
totally agreed. that guy is insane talented. he was arguably the best offensive player in the afc through about 5 weeks in 2011.
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 14, 2012 2:25 PM EST up reply actions
I think he is pretty talented, he just never screamed “top 5 pick to me” when he came out.
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
That would depend on your draft philosophy. The Davis led Raiders for example, loved drafting speed. Most of us here don’t think any RB would scream “top 5 pick.”
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
You all know my philosophy when it comes to RB’s.
If I had to use a first round pick on any RB since 1990, it would no doubt be Darren McFadden. I have never seen a team just rely on a guy to make play after play like Arkansas did with him.
Look at these three games when he was a Junior. South Carolina. Alabama. And the best in my opinion, LSU.
He single-handily made Arkansas a dangerous team. Remember, he was injured against USC in ’06 and Arkansas got blasted 50-14.
He came back and that team won 10 games. He was unreal.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 14, 2012 9:26 PM EST up reply actions
this is an unbelievably overstated case for richardson. i’ll only be ok w/ the browns taking richardson in the second round. stay away from him — and all rb’s — in the first.
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 14, 2012 2:26 PM EST up reply actions
Preach on! Soon we will convert the non-believers! Come! Be saved!
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 14, 2012 3:15 PM EST up reply actions
What the HELL do you mean were not winning the Superbowl next year?
Where taking the BROWNS to the SUPERBOWL is not a joke,but a life's passion!
by ctowndawgpound on Feb 11, 2012 3:15 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
so you read every single post up to the one you responded to?
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Gotta be you.
When you consider more things from all angles, you'll get more things from all angles. We'll be kicking ourselves if we don't get Burflict.
by The New Kardiac Kids on Feb 12, 2012 12:53 AM EST up reply actions
Let’s just keep trading down until we own the entire 7th round. We’re sure to find some starters there!
Once you start comparing a QB to Drew Brees, you've lost the argument.
by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 12, 2012 2:38 AM EST reply actions
TOM BRADEE WAS A 6 ROUDNER!!!!!!1
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 14, 2012 2:26 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Josh Norris, a draft guy who writes some stuff for Rotoworld, just tweeted this:
I cannot be more explicit when I say if you think a QB will be a quality starter, take the QB first then worry about the weapons he has.
Emphasis mine. I think that’s spot on.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Feb 12, 2012 5:46 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
Just posted on PD:
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2012/02/recipe_for_nfl_success_find_a.html
I learned real early that, number one, you have to get the quarterback when you have a chance," said Accorsi, a former Browns general manager from 1985-92. “I don’t care what the circumstances are.”
by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 7:09 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Ok, we take RG3 at 4. And don’t give up 2 more quality starters in exchange.
by gentryholdem on Feb 13, 2012 9:10 PM EST up reply actions
!!!
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2012 6:13 PM EST up reply actions
I’ll be the first to say I wasn’t high on RG3 at the beginning, but boy do I want him now. Everything I read about him makes me think he’ll be an instant playmaker in the NFL and would bring an excitement to the Browns that hasn’t been there in years. Trade up, do whatever it takes to get him, because I think he’s the real deal.
His stats and vids should have convinced you a long time ago.
by Brownie's Year on Feb 15, 2012 8:51 PM EST up reply actions
I appreciate all the passion for a winner in Cleveland. QB? My personal humble opinion is that it would be much much much better to put more focus on serious upgrade on the WORST performance positions. We need to sign at least 2 or 3 high quality FA’s, my choices – Meachum WR, Davis TE, and any available defensive need. Don’t neglect the offensive line in the draft. In the second round draft Zeitler OG, and even if H & H plan to move Pinkston to ROT take the best OT available with one of the 4th round choices. If you plug UFA’s in the offensive line – you may strike gold, but NOT if you use 2 or 3 of them. Give ANY QB time and protection. McCoy, Wallace, new competition, ect. Have an offensive line that can kick butt and drive the ball down the field, getting 3rd and 4th down conversions, ball control, and not settling for field goals, with greater red zone effeciency. 1st pick, trade down and take best player for need. 2nd pick McCaron SS at 22. 3rd pick Zietler, and if getting a 2nd round pick up from trading down, OLB and there are some decent ones. You gotta get Meachum first in FA though.
QB is one of the worst performance positions. Our BPA for need is RGIII.
I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.
by Aussie Brown on Feb 16, 2012 5:30 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
My personal humble opinion
well thank you for that.
r to put more focus on serious upgrade on the WORST performance positions.
you mean quarterback?
I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.
Follow @BRoss2013
http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/
Like DBN on Facebook
by bross09 on Feb 16, 2012 9:16 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
put more focus on serious upgrade on the WORST performance positions.
Like Bross mentions above, QB was pretty ‘meh’ last season. Even if you do believe that Colt wasn’t the worst, you are overlooking a key fact.
A team can win with poor performances from a RT, RG, TE, DE, FS, etc.
A team can’t win with poor performance from a QB.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 16, 2012 9:34 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t know if I agree about poor performance from RG/RT. They are generally easier positions to fill than LT so there is a wider set of players for those spots, but if they’re getting blown up every other play like they were for parts of last year its pretty tough to execute. That said, watching RG3 play, his line was sometimes non-existent and he handled the pressure great, either by stepping up, running, or standing in and taking a blow right after releasing the ball. He’ll make whoever is playing over there look better.
Yet another overly-specific plan that involves many different moves, few of which are likely to happen. Wouldn’t it be easier to address our one area of extreme need, which also happens to be the most important position in the sport?
I’ve never heard anyone say “boy, if only Peyton Manning had some more weapons around him, he’d really be something.” All I’ve heard is “those Colts WRs have really turned into something under Peyton Manning.”
Everyone is certainly entitled to their own opinion, but I’m just flabbergasted by how many people want to continue making excuses for the fact that our QB position is a nightmare. Colt has had long enough to take the starting QB job and run with it, and he hasn’t done it. This isn’t the early years, where the organization gave Tim Couch 2 scarecrows and some tackling dummies for protection. We have an OL that some of the teams who were in the playoffs this year would love to have, and our WRs would look much better if the ball was getting to them when/how it needs to in the NFL.
We need a QB, plain and simple. A 20-step plan involving every other position on the field won’t fix that.
Resident Tim Couch Apologist.
Yet another overly-specific plan that involves many different moves
“Nah, guys, we don’t need RG3. ALL we need to do is follow the next 14 steps I’m about to lay out to the letter, and then cross our fingers that something turns on for Colt. THAT’S IT.”
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Feb 16, 2012 2:50 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Give ANY QB time and protection.
Any OL is only going to be able to give just so much time and protection, especially if the QB doesn’t make the right pre-snap read and adjustments.
"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
I have the best wife - ever.
i want RG3…and bad…and right now no matter how bad i hope that he falls to us at 4 id be ok with giving up 22 to move up…i know this team has many holes but QB is the most important position and …sorry but McCoy is not the answer.. im confident that if our FO likes Griffin he will be a brown…unless Schnieder pulls a Schnieder and gives up the farm…my dream senerio is the skins get Manning the phins get Flynn and Floyd makes it to us at 22
by junkyard dawgz on Feb 15, 2012 11:48 PM EST reply actions
yeah i agree that we have to be careful of those other teams making a move also..the browns are in PRIME position this year because we have an extra first and the rams would only drop two spots and still get either Kahil or Blackmon..hell with only dropping two spots they would still hold an extremely valuable pick for another trade down..the rams could make out like bandits and turn that 2 pick into 3 firsts and a second easilly..i know thats what id be thinking if i were a rams fan…..bottom line though if we can get Griffin for both firsts this year im all in ….but thats it..wouldnt give up anything else and instead take Blackmon at 4…if Blackmons gone also ..im looking to trade down
Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Browns refused to offer more than their 2nd rounder and next years 3rd rounder to move up two spots. I think the real question is how do they really view McCoy? It’s entirely possible they could decide to just surround him with weapons. Blackmon at 4 and Wright at 22 would send a resounding message, no? It would be impossible for McCoy to fail with a 3 WR combo of Blackmon, Wright, and Little? Plus Norwood. Then the featured TE. And what if Indianapolis makes Luck available?
The reality is that, in my opinion, we don’t trade away future starters to get one player after finishing the last two years with 4 wins. We continue to build talent. Especially considering the age of Pittsburgh and Baltimore.
If RGIII is available at 4 we take him. If not we do what’s best for the franchise.
by gentryholdem on Feb 17, 2012 7:35 PM EST up reply actions
It would be impossible for McCoy to fail with a 3 WR combo of Blackmon, Wright, and Little
this is the wrongest statement i think i’ve ever heard.
you absolutely continue to build talent … especially at the most important position in the game. if you can move up to take a top-shelf talent at qb, obviously you do it. we have an entire free agency period and at least a half dozen other picks to acquire additional talent.
by DontCallMeJoey on Feb 17, 2012 8:32 PM EST up reply actions
If RGIII is available at 4 we take him. If not we do what’s best for the franchise.
So you ARE in favor of trading up for the 2.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Feb 18, 2012 10:39 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
You are overvaluing WR’s effect on QB’s. Even the greatest WR can’t be great with poor QB play.
we don’t trade away future starters to get one player after finishing the last two years with 4 wins.
Hate to be the broken record, but we finished with 4 wins because of our QB play.
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 18, 2012 11:56 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Well, then forget what I said. COLT = CHAMPIONSHIP BABY!!!!
by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 18, 2012 8:06 PM EST up reply actions
completely agree with that statement joey…i hate to give up picks and would only do it for griffin…we as browns fans need something to be excited about…theres risks with every player and every pick..it would be so nice to have our stud QB to groom..theres no athlete at the QB positon like griffin in FA and there wont be anytime soon…GET RG3 and surround him with talent…. i just dont see McCoy ever being special..addaquit at best..even with Blackmon/wright/little trio..all i ever have been happy about mccoy is his ability and guts to tuck it in and pick up a first down RUNNING the ball..enough said IMO

by 


















