Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

Latest SB Nation NFL Mock Draft: Browns Take Claiborne and Floyd

Early last week, SB Nation released the latest edition of their 2012 NFL Mock Draft, serving as their first mock draft of the year in which the exact order of the first round of the draft was known. Even though nothing really happened that should've changed the Browns' picks in a span of two weeks, that's exactly what did happen. In the previous mock draft, SB Nation has the Browns taking WR Justin Blackmon and QB Ryan Tannehill. This time, the picks were changed to CB Morris Claiborne and WR Michael Floyd. The explanations are after the jump.

Star-divide

4. Cleveland Browns, Morris Claiborne, CB, LSU

If Cleveland does keep this pick and Griffin is off the board, they have some choices to make. Trent Richardson or Justin Blackmon are both viable options here. But Claiborne upgrades what was already a solid defense, which should pay immediate dividends.

22. Cleveland Browns (from Atlanta), Michael Floyd, WR, Notre Dame

Will the Browns really go into the 2012 season with Colt McCoy as their quarterback? Maybe not. Then again, maybe they wait a year to find McCoy's replacement, choosing instead to tweak around the edges of the roster in the hopes of being more competitive this season. Floyd would pair nicely with Greg Little, giving the Browns a legitimate top receiver.

If the Browns do go defense early on, it would seem like Claiborne is the likely pick. With all the needs this team has offensively though, I just don't see it happening with the risk that we don't get a highly-touted offensive prospect with our other first-round pick.

Side note: we'll be launching the sign ups for the 2012 Dawgs By Nature Community Mock Draft any day now. Don't make your reservations yet, but be on the looking some time in the coming week!

Comment 274 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Last year on the 2012 DBN Community Mock Draft I did the Bengals. I did well too, I mocked for AJ Green, and Christian Ponder.

"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown

by macdowellm03 on Feb 11, 2012 9:42 PM EST reply actions  

I picked Blaine Gabbert for the Vikings last year. (Ultimately, in real life Gabbert went two picks before and the Vikings were forced to settle with Christian Ponder.)

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 11, 2012 10:40 PM EST up reply actions  

“Settle” is clearly the wrong word. Turned out to be a blessing in disguise.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Feb 12, 2012 12:42 AM EST up reply actions  

I did Carolina and predicted Newton.

Too bad THAT never happened.

Only thing manlier than football? Ponies.

by BrownDawg1409 on Feb 12, 2012 10:00 PM EST up reply actions  

no.

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

by pwndabear on Feb 11, 2012 9:53 PM EST reply actions  

Not a big Floyd fan, but he would be ok. We need a WR there.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 11, 2012 10:16 PM EST reply actions  

Can I ask why not? I think Floyd may be my favorite WR in this draft. Depending on his performance at the combine, I think he could jump above Blackmon.

I have admit my opinion is biased because I’ve watched far more ND games than OK State games, but I haven’t read or heard anything that would make me sad about picking Floyd.

by BiggieBrown on Feb 11, 2012 10:37 PM EST up reply actions  

multiple DUIs
multiple injuries

Enough for you? If not, let’s keep going

Doesn’t have elite lateral ability
Doesn’t get great separation. So much so that it was so frequent that I have seen “catches the ball with the DB all over him” as a positive.

I think that’s enough…

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 1:58 AM EST up reply actions  

So what does everyone else see in him to make him a first round projection? All that info makes him a 5-6th rounder to me.

"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown

by macdowellm03 on Feb 12, 2012 2:01 AM EST up reply actions  

I can still see why he is a 1st rounder. The guy is 6’3’’ 225 pounds, put up some elite production, has great route running, maybe the best hands outside of Blackmon, and great body control.

His lateral ability and ability to separate are much better than that you find in the 5th/6th round, but not at all great and not what I like to get with a 1st rounder (which is why I see him as a 1st/2nd round guy).

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 5:00 AM EST up reply actions  

He hasn’t had a DUI in a few years. I am not sure what injuries you are talking about, and being chronically under thrown has helped the DB catch up to him constantly. Plus, in a league where everyone is fast, being able to out jump DBs definitely seems like a positive to me.

Also, I said I would like to see his 40 time at the combine. I think he might be a little faster than people think. I might be wrong, but I think he could surprise people.

by BiggieBrown on Feb 12, 2012 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

His 3rd DUI was last year. Had 3 in a 3 year span.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t want to defend DUIs believe me. Floyd worked hard to get back on the team and kept his nose clean after his last DUI. When he gets millions to play in the NFL all his bad habits might come back. Maybe they are a good reason to pass him up, I just think his physical talents are currently undervalued. The combine will either prove me right or wrong.

by BiggieBrown on Feb 12, 2012 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

The DUIs don’t really concern me. I wouldn’t hate taking him with our second pick. He’s a big kid.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

His last DUI was a year ago, but he’s “kept his nose clean” since? Here in PA, he wouldn’t even be close to being terminated from his parole for having 3 DUIs in the last 3 years, which gives a person more incentive to stay out of further trouble to avoid significant jail time. What would happen after he no longer has a court to answer to?

Also, a large percentage of those who I see for multiple DUI offenses have serious alcohol problems/are alcoholics. I’m not interested in this kid.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

How has he not done jail time for getting a 3rd one? Here in CA it’s like 3 months minimum.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d like to point out that he had one DUI, and two citations for underage drinking, one in Minnesota where he is from and one on campus. After the DUI in order to be reinstated he agreed to live in the ND’s freshman dorm his senior season. He claims to have given up drinking. I don’t know if its true or not, but he doesn’t have three DUI’s. He has one on March 20, 2011.

He might have problem with alcohol. I think there is also some evidence after the DUI he tried to clean up his act. I can understand why it would make people hesitate to draft him.

by BiggieBrown on Feb 12, 2012 3:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Correction: He was cited for underage drinking twice in Minnesota and the DUI was one block from ND campus.

by BiggieBrown on Feb 12, 2012 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Only one?! That’s what I get for listening to people on here.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Here is the article I read about it. http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/independent1a/2011-08-03-notre-dame-reinstates-michael-floyd_n.htm

I think any DUIs are bad news. No one should drive drunk. I just think he may be better than currently rated. Plus I admitted in other posts I am totally biased because I am an ND fan.

by BiggieBrown on Feb 12, 2012 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I just read an ESPN article.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Foolish lad.

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
I have the best wife - ever.

by JustBob on Feb 12, 2012 6:10 PM EST up reply actions  

There was some evidence Josh Hamilton was fully recovered too, but he relapsed…and I have never seen anyone work harder to overcome addiction than him.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Floyd worked hard to get back on the team and kept his nose clean after his last DUI.

it was his 3rd DUI in 3 years and it hasn’t been a year since the incident. I don’t know the details, but he was most likely on some sort of probation anyways and had to keep his nose clean or he could go to jail.

all his bad habits might come back

it’s very likely those habits come back.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

It wasn’t his third DUI. Two were underage drinking. I know plenty of people who aren’t alcoholics who got cited for underage drinking in college.

by BiggieBrown on Feb 12, 2012 3:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, I got cited for underage drinking too…I just didn’t do it twice and proceed to get a DUI.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

This.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

He hasn’t had a DUI in a few years

Nope, read the article.

I am not sure what injuries you are talking about

The ones that caused him to miss games in 2008, 2009, and one game in 2010. And the injury he suffered in the last game of the college season.

Those balls were not chronically underthrown back when he was getting throws from Clausen…and there were still these questions then,

There is seriously no way you are not a ND fan…but that shouldn’t create this kind of bias and ignoring facts. I am not going to say Devier Posey should be a first round WR.

You also seem to be under the impression that if he can run a good 40, all of a sudden he can create separation deep.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I did read the article. I am an ND fan. In a few weeks he won’t have had a DUI in a year. Nothing to be proud of I agree. I think he might be better than currently rated. Didn’t mean to personally offend anyone with my opinion.

by BiggieBrown on Feb 12, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I am an ND fan.

not a shocker…

I am not offended…maybe only by the extent of homerism.

I think Floyd is a good talent, but not top-5 elite imo and comes with some serious question marks. Great value in the 2nd round for us if he falls.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I never understood that term “homerism.” I am totally biased, but at the some time I can offer a more informed opinion about Floyd than Blackmon because I watched more ND games than OK State games. I am not knocking Blackmon. If we draft him before Floyd, good for us. I just think Floyd might be underrated, especially his speed. If the combine shows otherwise than I’ll admit I was totally wrong.

by BiggieBrown on Feb 12, 2012 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you have watched a good amount of tape on Floyd, but at the same time you seemed to just brush off character/injury concerns as if they were nothing. Those are the things keeping him out of the top 15.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

One DUI isn’t a character issue. It’s just a mistake.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

No it’s not. Don’t try to trick yourself into think it is.

It’s not a mistake you drank enough to go over the legal limit. It’s not a mistake he got behind the wheel. To think it was a mistake is to be ignorant.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Feb 12, 2012 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

This is complete BS. First of all, you don’t always get a chance to blow, and if you do the level is ridiculously low so that if you just rinsed your mouth with mouthwash you could potentially fail it. I had dinner with a co-worker last year who had 1 beer and half a shot of whiskey. He’s at least 6’1" and over 200 lbs and he had them early in the dinner. He got pulled over going home and administered a ridiculous sobriety test of having to stand on one leg and say the alphabet backwards, which he failed in the officers estimation and got a year long licence suspension. I’m not advocating driving drunk but the tolerance is so low now a one off is almost excusable.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 6:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Your co-worker should have gotten another test at the station that would have cleared him.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 6:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I told him that too, but I guess the whole situation was pretty confusing for him.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 7:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m a probation officer, I deal with DUI offenders on a daily basis, and I used to teach Alcohol Highway Safety School for DUI offenders; I’m not sure what state it was in, but if your friend got a license suspension, it was probably because he refused a blood test after the field sobriety tests.

At 200+ lbs, he wouldn’t be over the legal limit even if he drank as much as you said he did within a few minutes, and shortly before being tested. After he failed the field sobriety tests, he would have been taken for a blood draw and been found to have been well under a .08 BAC. Here in PA, if you refuse any of the tests, you get a license suspension even if you aren’t subsequently charged with DUI.

Are you sure he didn’t drink more than you think he did? It takes more alcohol to get to a .08 BAC than what most people think it takes.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Well I’m sure he was not even at .08 and that’s why I was asking him why he didn’t demand to blow. He said he wasn’t sure why he didn’t. This was in Ohio. Unless he drank after we left, and I have no reason to think he did since his commute is an hour long, we were face to face at a dinner table eating sushi. He ordered a scotch and even that pour was really weak (they just have waitresses, not a real bar or bartender) and he spilled part of the shot on his shirt. Then he had a beer.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

You have never had a sip of alcohol before. You literally have no idea what you’re talking about.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 6:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Since you’ve never had a drink in your life, you don’t know what it does to people. It’s very easy to get drunk when you didn’t mean to. It’s very easy to make stupid decisions while drunk. That doesn’t excuse those decisions, but it puts them in context. Nobody who drinks and drives is purposely putting people in danger. They usually think they are perfectly fine and don’t think what they are doing is stupid or dangerous.

They’re wrong, of course. But to anyone who has been drunk it’s very easy to see how someone could think otherwise.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I personally fear the texters and cell phone users more than I do the drunks.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Someone correct this if I’m wrong, but I think I remember reading they’re close to as dangerous.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 9:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I heard that too.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 9:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Texters are generally more dangerous. It’s drunk textures that are the problem.

Once you start comparing a QB to Drew Brees, you've lost the argument.

by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 12, 2012 11:15 PM EST up reply actions  

They’re so blurry they’re hard to make out.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2012 9:14 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

This. We often tell DUI offenders that getting 1 can be a mistake. But then, after they’ve gone through the system and taken our classes that teach them about drinking and driving, and the effects of alcohol, it’s more likely that people that get subsequent DUIs have alcohol issues.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 7:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I have been through those programs. I tend to agree with you. Since I turned 21, I have driven a few times with a couple drinks and because of my size, I have a high tolerance…and I am still very careful.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

So that means you can question people’s character because you haven’t been caught yet? That’s bullshit.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 7:58 PM EST up reply actions  

No, I am saying that even if I am at a .04, I am extremely careful of what I am doing because of my experience going through a diversion program.

I will never drive with more than 2-3 drinks in me and depending on what they are, that isn’t anything more than a .05-.06 (and that’s pushing it)

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re wrong on this. Even if you blew a .02, you can get arrested. If you fail one little field test, you’re done. Don’t sit there and say it’s ok for you to have a few drinks and drive. You’re guilty if DUI but haven’t been busted yet. Stop acting like your better than anyone.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 8:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I was physically fine enough to pass a field test. Wouldn’t even be close to failing except for spelling the alphabet backwards, but I can’t do that sober.

I am not acting like I am better than anyone. I am talking specifically about how the state diversion program made me more cautious.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Everyone thinks they’re fine after drinking.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 8:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Which is exactly why you designate a driver before you start drinking

"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown

by macdowellm03 on Feb 12, 2012 8:26 PM EST up reply actions  

you are still missing the point.

WTF are you saying, in all seriousness. I have been drunk enough to know how it is affecting me physically. The situations I am talking about, I am easily less dangerous on the roads than if I was kinda tired.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I couldn’t pass a field test sober.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 8:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Even if you blew a .02, you can get arrested.

What? Not if you’re over 21.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 9:30 PM EST up reply actions  

If you fail a test the cop can do what ever the hell he wants.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 9:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Favorite comment of the thread.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2012 9:14 AM EST up reply actions  

and didnt blackmon get busted for DUI?? in texas no less, hes lucky they didnt give him the chair for that one! But I would still take blackmon over floyd. if floyd would happen( I know very unlikely) to fall to the third, i would say give him a shot, at playing… not of scotch.

Lifes A Dance, You Learn As You Go!

by findlaybrownslover on Feb 13, 2012 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

I would say some of it does come down to your base common sense.

I do understand how someone can think it would be okay to drive, but I was arrested for underage drinking. I had to get piss tested (because of other things) and go through probation and a diversion program. I was also in a car during the process.

I will never forget the experience and will never be stupid about drinking because of it. my worry is that he was arrested twice before for underage drinking. Either they knew he was a star athlete and treated him differently or he just didn’t care. Either way, it worries me.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 7:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Okay I wanted to not post anything but, you do NOT have to have ever had a single drink to know what it does to people. All specialbrownie is saying is that a DUI is ALWAYS a choice that you make. People should know as soon as the receive the first drink, that they shouldn’t drive. Yet some people do anyway, and sometimes it leads to terrible things. I don’t think the risk is ever worth it, but I would believe that a ton of people drink and drive all the time and nothing ever happens.

"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown

by macdowellm03 on Feb 12, 2012 8:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes. To choose to drink and then later drive under the influence it the person’s own choice. If you made the choice while inebriated, you still put yourself into that state.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Feb 12, 2012 8:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve never murdered anyone either.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Feb 12, 2012 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

And as far as you know, neither have I.

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
I have the best wife - ever.

by JustBob on Feb 13, 2012 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

You don’t know what you’re talking about.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 7:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I know exactly what I’m talking about. I don’t need to get a DUI to “understand” why it’s a mistake. It’s ignorant to say it’s a mistake. This long line of people bashing me is just a line of biases because you all drink and want an excuse to what it can turn you into. You drink, you accept the responsibility it brings.

I don’t need to murder someone to understand that murdering is wrong and something I shouldn’t do.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Feb 12, 2012 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, because everyone who drinks ends up killing someone. Get off your high horse.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 8:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I think I’d probably kill someone if I couldn’t drink

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 8:21 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

There’s a higher probability though. Especially when driving.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Feb 12, 2012 8:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, old people, 16 year olds, people on meds aren’t problems either.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Teen drivers scare the shit outta me. I know how I drove when I was a teenager, and I’m terrified of the day my daughters start driving.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 9:11 PM EST up reply actions  

One DUI is an isolated mistake. The whole situation shows precedent to believe he may have a problem.

I have drank underage, but I didn’t do it a lot and was at least smart about it. I wouldn’t have racked up 2 underage drinking charges and a DUI.

I’d also say his blood alcohol level depends on if it was just a mistake or really dumb and dangerous. Supposedly he blew a .19 which is starting to get into the range where I consider it “dumb and dangerous”. I’d say anything double the legal limit is probably dumb/dangerous vs. a mistake, but anything over .2 is definitely dumb/dangerous.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 6:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Alcohol effects people in different ways. I’m not proud of it, but I have 2 DUIs. A .14 and a .21. I have a high tolerance and can drive under those circumstances. Not saying it’s cool that I do, but I know when I can’t.

1- 6/6/06 (.14) The clutch burned out on my 2002 WS6. Cop pulled up behind me to see what was wrong. I passed all the tests but failed the breathalyzer.

2- 3/27/09 (.21) Coming home from the driving range and some jerk slammed in to my Dakota. Cop pulled up behind me to see what was wrong. I passed all the tests but failed the breathalyzer.

Both cops knew I was fine, apologized and said they had to do their job (revenue is more important). So I don’t hate them for it.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 7:36 PM EST up reply actions  

that’s very true. Some people I know can drink a lot and not be “shitfaced” in how they act. most people don’t have your tolerance and you weren’t pulled over under any suspicion either of those times.

Floyd ran a stop sign stupidly and failed the field tests too.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

This conversation reminded me that I need to get to the liqour store before 9.

DBN, is there anything you can’t do?

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 7:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Solve arguments.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 9:31 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

He big, produced at a high level in college, and makes pretty good plays with DBs draped all over him.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 12, 2012 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Multiple DUI’s No thank you! I wouldn’t want ANYONE that hasn’t learned their lesson after the first one!

Where taking the BROWNS to the SUPERBOWL is not a joke,but a life's passion!

by ctowndawgpound on Feb 12, 2012 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Keep reading the comments. One DUI.

by Legoman0721 on Feb 12, 2012 5:35 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

And?

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Feb 12, 2012 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

One DUI can be a mistake.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 6:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Nope. People know THROUGHOUT LIFE all the way to 21 that drinking and driving is a no-no. That is brings about HUGE CONSEQUENCES including possibility of manslaughter.

No mistakes, no excuses.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Feb 12, 2012 8:00 PM EST up reply actions  

This is true every time you drive a car. I see people who may or may not be drunk driving recklessly, driving while exhausted, and driving while distracted. Everyone of those is just as bad, if not worse than having a drink or too then driving.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 8:53 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Basically this. SB, I know you like to do work on your honda. Did you put in a loud muffler? That’s a risk. If you get in an accident because you didn’t hear a siren will it be a mistake or not?

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 9:33 PM EST up reply actions  

He wouldn’t hear the sirens because the Lady Gaga is too loud.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 9:48 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

There was an exhaust on it anyways but it no way inhibits my driving. Besides, the DBs it produces isn’t illegal. So, it’s not really a substitutive situation

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Feb 13, 2012 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

it no way inhibits my driving.

This argument seems oddly familiar.

it’s not really a substitutive situation

I don’t see why not. Legality doesn’t change whether or not something impairs driving. Loud noise impairs driving, so does booze. Obviously booze is worse, but the logic and morals involved are the same.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2012 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

No, drinking while driving is illegal. Not all exhausts are illegal. Also, I didn’t install it myself. Exhausts sit at different tones throughout a drive, you can’t fluctuate your sobriety on a dime.

It’s not really the same at all.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Feb 13, 2012 9:02 PM EST up reply actions  

If you’re below .08, driving after drinking is legal. It’s not always against the law to be under the influence and driving.

by Legoman0721 on Feb 13, 2012 10:58 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

How do you know that THROUGHOUT LIFE he has been told how bad drinking and driving is? For all we know, he did exactly what his parents showed him to do. I don’t know Floyd, and neither do you. Maybe he screwed up and learned from it. I’m not going to demonize somebody for a mistake they made when they were young and then learned from.

by Legoman0721 on Feb 13, 2012 11:00 AM EST via Android app up reply actions  

I think I may want to try the DBN Mock this year. Do we pick the team to represent or is that done at random?

by Brownie's Year on Feb 11, 2012 10:18 PM EST reply actions  

If I recall correctly, last year we picked our team. I had a good time making the Bucs pick, and I still think I chose well even though they went a different direction.

by Legoman0721 on Feb 12, 2012 5:36 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

OT, I am watching Pebble and thinking this is going to be a loooong winter. I’m ready to play some golf again.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 5:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I was watching it off and on. Tiger putted like crap. Lefty just won. I hate that guy. Changed the channel after his final put.
I’ve never played Pebble because I’ve heard from a lot of people that it is overrated. So $250 just never seemed worth it. But I do live about 20 minutes from Torrey Pines ($240) and we have plans to play that in the future.

We’re getting in to rainy season here. I played on Monday and got sick. This week is gunna be rainy so I probably won’t get out till Friday.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

But I do live about 20 minutes from Torrey Pines ($240) and we have plans to play that in the future.

I’m really pissed at you right now.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 7:46 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re always pissed at me when I talk golf.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I haven’t left my house since 2:30pm yesterday, it’s cold as shit outside, and the ground is covered in snow. It’s not you, it’s me.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 8:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Stop bitching and get a golf simulator!! That’s what I would do if I were you.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 8:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m thinking about setting up one of those in my basement. Get a cheap projector and screen, grab an old laptop and the simulator you see on Golf Channel and practice all winter. That’s the worst part of living in cold weather – just when you’re swing is rounding out I quit for 5 months and have to start back over again with my natural crap swing.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 8:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I never even considered that. I always assumed they were crazy expensive.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 9:15 PM EST up reply actions  

The one HD mentioned above is $400. You don’t need a drop screen. You can use one but all you need is a computer. It seems pretty legit with all the censors it has.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 9:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m on an indoor Monday night league. The simulators we use can’t be the $400 ones you’re referring to, very high tech. Amazing how they can pick up ball spin and trajectory. If you know how to vary your ball flight – this thing is spot on. Good way to keep the swing up when there’s 6" of snow on the ground anyway.

What does that MEAN - TO PLAY US OUT?!!?!?

by DaveDawg09 on Feb 12, 2012 11:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow, like a bowling league? That’s pretty awesome. Never heard of those before. The one HD and I are talking about is called OptiShot. It’s a home thing. A mat with censors that hooks up to your comp via usb.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 11:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Yup, kinda like a bowling league. It’s a smaller place – just a driving range in the summer, but they installed 2 simulator booths inside for the winters. They have play on 4 nights a week that add up to a “league” of 40-50 people. They keep handicaps, play pinshots and skins, have an “A” and “B” flight based on a handicap cut point and everything It’s a great way to spend a snowy weeknight.

I won the “B” flight 3 years ago. First place was a brand new Cleveland Hi-Bore driver. I love that club. I probably would never have bought one, but man can I hit the thing.

What does that MEAN - TO PLAY US OUT?!!?!?

by DaveDawg09 on Feb 12, 2012 11:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Damn, that sounds cool as hell.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 13, 2012 12:05 AM EST up reply actions  

That is awesome, what a great idea. I’m pretty sure the ones you use at the range are much more expensive.

by HenryDawg on Feb 13, 2012 9:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I had to leave my house yesterday and froze my ass off.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 9:01 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s like $400+ now and I’ve heard the same thing – about 4 great holes and a bunch of average ones. I still want to play it once. Wish I wasn’t always broke when I lived in Norcal.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Woah, it was 250 like 7 years ago.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 8:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I know its ridiculous. Last time I went to Vegas the cheapest course we could find under $200 was a average Palmer designed resort course.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Vegas has some sic ass courses.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 9:08 PM EST up reply actions  

There are courses in Vegas that people don’t know about. For a large roll of cash you can take a limo out to a course and your caddy is a hot chick.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 9:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I also should mention that they are brothel courses. Every guy’s fantasy.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 9:24 PM EST up reply actions  

So can you, uh, you know…on the golf course?

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 9:34 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s what i’ve heard. It cost a lot of money though.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 9:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I say when the Browns win the Super Bowl, we meet in Vegas and play a few of those courses. The type of celebration we’ll have earned for putting up with this shit for so many years.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 9:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey everybody, we’re all gunna get laid!

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 10:00 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 10:10 PM EST up reply actions  

DBN, is there nothing you can’t do?

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 10:30 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

It brings people together in mysterious ways.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

“Hey BY, $100 you slice it into the woods!”

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 11:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey Whitey, where’s your hat?

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 11:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Torrey Pines is awesome, don’t you get a discount for living in SD county or something?

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

The courses here do give city or county discounts. I have check what TP’s is.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 8:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I think its a lot, my brothers friend moved out there and when he visited it was like $50

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 9:00 PM EST up reply actions  

There are two courses there. The TP North is pretty cheap. TP South is the major one. $292 for non-residents. $150 for San Diego residents.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s worth it for a course that’s a regular on the tour and the major rotation.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

The only tour course I’ve ever played was Coyote Creek in Morgan Hill, CA. It’s a Jack Nicklaus course and the Champions Tour used to play the Siebel Open at. Not sure if they still do that though. I think I paid around $120 for a weekend rate.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 11:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know if I can pay $300 to play a course. 150 would be fine but I don’t live in San Diego.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 11:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Claiborne over Blackmon would be a terrible decision in my opinion. I if this mock turned out to be true, it would be a pretty atrocious draft on the Browns part considering the other options that were very much available.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 11, 2012 10:36 PM EST reply actions  

What i’ve heard from quite a few scouting report is that Blackmon is not really elite – not the physical freak that Dez Bryant or Julio Jones was, nor the speed-demon with hands of glue ala Green. If we keep the 4 pick and don’t draft a top QB, I would much rather have a true elite player (Claiborne) than a non-elite one, even if it’s an area of DIRE need. Besides that, we’ve all heard how wonderfully deep this draft is at the WR position. Further, it would make more sense to me to grab a K. Wright type that would stretch the field. Blackmon seems too similar (though probably better) to Little in his skillset.

We need elite talent with that #4 pick. If that type of talent at a skill position isn’t available at 4, I hope we’re able to trade down for more picks.

That said, I’m still in the camp that would have us go for RG3 (barring the need to sell the farm to get him)

by Vududawg on Feb 12, 2012 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Claiborne would not be a game changer for the Browns whether he’s an elite CB talent or not. I think Blackmon has for more potential to be a game changer for the Browns.

That said, I’m still in the camp that would have us go for RG3 (barring the need to sell the farm to get him)

On this we agree.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 12, 2012 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you are right – but you could say the same thing about Jerry Rice. Really was attention to detail, competitiveness that made him great.

Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen

by realmccoy on Feb 12, 2012 2:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Blackmon is a better prospect than Dez Bryant.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 12, 2012 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

watch the sports science on him. He doesn’t run a 4.35 and isn’t 6’5’’, but has some incredible skills nonetheless. He is about as skilled as Bryant and is pretty darn physically gifted.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

He definitely has the best ball skills in the draft this year. I wouldn’t call him a can’t miss WR though. Possibly not even a #1

by The Licensed Pessimist on Feb 12, 2012 9:15 PM EST up reply actions  

If we went defense, I think I’d rather take a DL or LB than a CB, but they’re may not be one worth picking that high. Maybe in this scenario, with RGIII off the board and not wanting Blackmon, it would be better to trade down.

by BiggieBrown on Feb 11, 2012 10:39 PM EST reply actions  

Perhaps. But, who would be trading up with us to get what player? If the two QBs are off the board at 4 I’m not sure who I see dealing with us; hadn’t really thought on that scenario much.

by Mal Reynolds on Feb 11, 2012 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

That is a pretty good point. I don’t anyone has thought about this scenario because, unless some bombshell hits before the draft, its unreasonable to think the Browns would not be interested in Blackmon, Floyd, or the #1 WR.

I would like to offense with 4 and defense with 22.

by BiggieBrown on Feb 11, 2012 10:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Good point. There are too many variables to do anything but speculate, but… maybe one of the trio of Kalil, Claiborne, or Coples. There’s usually a couple elite players on the board at the 4 spot though.

by Vududawg on Feb 12, 2012 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

But Claiborne upgrades what was already a solid defense, which should pay immediate dividends.

Because upgrading already solid secondaries payed immediate dividends for the Eagles and Jets?

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 11, 2012 10:43 PM EST reply actions  

Apples and oranges. Those were FA acquisitions where expectations were only exceeded by the enormous egos of players. Building an elite D backfield through the draft would be completely different.

by Vududawg on Feb 12, 2012 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Shouldnt our priority be more on the front seven though? Most trams just ran over us.

by FrenchToast979 on Feb 12, 2012 1:11 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

I don’t see how it’s different. The Eagles and Jets clearly have elite secondaries. It didn’t help them all that much.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

They should have elite secondaries, Nnamdi was terrible this year.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 12, 2012 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair point. The explanation floating around is that they had him playing too much zone, does that seem legit to you? I think it’s odd that he would be that good at man coverage and that bad at zone.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 3:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Man coverage guys are usually the ones you covet. I don’t understand why Philly would line him up in zone if that was really the problem. Just friggin lock him on his guy and roll coverage everywhere else or blitz everyone.

It doesn’t make sense to pay that much for a guy that good and then just not use him as a key piece of what you are doing.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 12, 2012 6:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Well the defensive coordinator was their O line coach the year before.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 6:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I forgot about that.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 13, 2012 12:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I am pretty sure this was a large factor. The D coordinator was clueless.

by Roger Dorn on Feb 13, 2012 10:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Well the defensive coordinator was their O line coach the year before.

Zone blocking schemes. Zone coverage schemes. Sounds similar — how hard can it be?

Once you start comparing a QB to Drew Brees, you've lost the argument.

by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 13, 2012 5:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Building an elite D backfield through the draft would be completely different.

Yeah, it’s worse.
But the results/impact, or lack there of, would be the same. If you already have a solid secondary, and the Browns do, you use the 4th overall pick on a DB, especially with a great WR prospect on the board when you need a WR.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 12, 2012 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

So building through the draft is worse? If you mean we would miss out on a top offensive player…I see what you’re trying to say, but still disagree. I’m not clamoring for a DB with our first. All i’m advocating is drafting as many elite players as possible.

I am no scout, just a voracious reader of scouting reports, all of which seem to share the opinion that the “great” WR you speak of is only good. Atl drafted a WR last year who was rated higher by many than Blackmon is, and that didn’t help at all.

Again, I understand our dire needs on offense, but that doesn’t mean we should panic and commit ourselves to anything less than the bpa. We have plenty of needs everywhere. Address the pass rush as bross09 suggests if that is where the best impact talent is at 4, or go get what may be an elite QB. But if you’re looking for Blckmon to come in and be a savior, I just don’t see it happening.

by Vududawg on Feb 13, 2012 3:19 AM EST up reply actions  

So building through the draft is worse?

Adding a CB where there is no need for one is not building through the draft.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 13, 2012 9:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Point taken and appreciated. Our difference seems to stem from my poor opinion of Sheldon’s play and the notion that in an increasingly pass friendly league, one can never have too many DBs. Maybe I’m just mooncamping for corners…

by Vududawg on Feb 13, 2012 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe I’m just mooncamping for corners…

Not unless you want fullbacks to play there because of their bicep to calf length ratio.

"We just lost to the Steelers 20 hours ago and that still hurts. I need to get home and eat a burrito." -Phil Dawson

by Adrock2099 on Feb 13, 2012 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, that’s pretty hilarious. I wasn’t calling myself mooncamping, more using it as a verb meaning – to obsess over a certain position group against all logic and wisdom.

by Vududawg on Feb 14, 2012 4:14 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I think that is appropriate for the DBN glossary. Make it so.

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
I have the best wife - ever.

by JustBob on Feb 14, 2012 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I think I am with you here if the evaluation is that Claiborne is elite and Blackmon is not.

by Roger Dorn on Feb 13, 2012 10:52 AM EST up reply actions  

I would rather take the better player regardless of position.

by Roger Dorn on Feb 13, 2012 10:52 AM EST up reply actions  

regardless

I understand your logic. However, I do think position should be a factor, even if it’s a minor one. For example, I don’t think we should take a player at a position we don’t need just because they may or may not be a slightly better prospect.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 13, 2012 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Its a factor for me, definitely. What you gain by drafting a player is partially dependent on what you lack. Certain positions have a bigger impact on the field. Certain positions are harder to find than others.

All of that comes into play.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 13, 2012 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s perfectly reasonable, and each pick has to be judged in terms of the trade off between need and talent.

Taking it further, some believe that looking for specific talents, rather than positions, that fit what the team wants to do, whether its causing mismatches, drafting guys with a lot of versatility, or guys that do one thing better than most anybody is the best scouting system. My guess is a good mixture of the above is probably best.

by Vududawg on Feb 14, 2012 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

In which case, if Kalil is on the board when we pick, there’s a strong possibility he’s the best player available. Do we take him?

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 13, 2012 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Now, with that example I wholeheartedly agree. When you’ve already got His Holiness at LT, drafting an elite pass-protector with deficiencies in run-blocking makes absolutely no sense. If there is one potential pick that would have me do a Scooby-Doo, that would be it.

by Vududawg on Feb 13, 2012 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I think in the scenario that he is clearly the best value, assuming your evaluations of the other guys are far below, then you would select Kalil.

by Roger Dorn on Feb 13, 2012 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

far below

If we’re picking regardless of position, it wouldn’t matter if the other prospects are far below or just slightly a hair behind.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 13, 2012 5:55 PM EST up reply actions  

an elite secondary doesn’t mean as much if the Browns have a below average pass rush again.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I would not understand using the 4th pick on anyone other than the player most likely to increase scoring. Although I would like another really good DE, I would hope that the Browns would also use the 22nd pick to improve the offense.

by JamesPowell on Feb 12, 2012 12:04 AM EST reply actions  

Huge ND fan here. I love Mike Floyd and think he’s one of the top 2 or 3 WRs in ND’s history, but I don’t see him being a big time game breaker in the NFL, or at least not a perfect fit for the Browns. He definitely has the hands and size to be a great possession receiver, but what the Browns need now are fast WRs who can blow the tops off defenses (obviously before we can “blow the tops off” or any defenses we need a QB who can get the ball there, but that’s another conversation), and I just don’t think Floyd has the ability to do that. I’m not saying I’d be upset with the pick, I just don’t think he’s perfect for our situation and we could probably do better.

by tr1betime on Feb 12, 2012 12:09 AM EST reply actions  

I’ll drink to that…hic

by Poppawolf on Feb 12, 2012 3:16 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I would agree to this if the WCO really needed burners. But I do think of you are picking a WR at #4 he does need elite speed (sub 4.5) and I’m seeing Blackmon quoted at 4.55, which is just OK.

If this is a weak year for WRs I hate the thought of burning high picks on reaching, though as we desperately need WR I cant see what else we can do either. I’d go D with the #4 then, if Coples doesn’t look good take Claibourne and shift Brown to FS.

....just need a guy called Byner to play RT...

by LondonBrown on Feb 12, 2012 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

There is a pretty deep class of FA wide receivers. I would love to get Steve Johnson, Robert Meachem or Pierre Garcon.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Blackmon has not run a 40 in a combine setting. “Quoting” him at something at this point is just some guy making a guess and posting it on the internet.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 12, 2012 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

And I’m not really all that concerned if guys are a few places after the decimal point apart after they run in the Combine. They’re not wearing pads, they’re not running routes, they’re not getting bumped by a DB.

Their speed matters, but I think game speed and Combine speed are two completely different things.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Feb 12, 2012 5:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Also the timers aren’t very accurate.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 5:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I heard they use sundials.

"We just lost to the Steelers 20 hours ago and that still hurts. I need to get home and eat a burrito." -Phil Dawson

by Adrock2099 on Feb 12, 2012 6:10 PM EST up reply actions  

They use pretty sophisticated timing systems, and no one trusts those so everyone uses their own timers too. That way you get a range of times and you can figure out how much deviation there is from the official time.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 12, 2012 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

This just means there’s a speared of opinions on how good Blackmon is. I wouldn’t want to waste a high pick (#4) on the #1 positional player if they’re not seen as game changers- especially if the positions is expected to draft deep.

If you’re not taking a QB in the top handful they do need to be “freaks”- Adrian Peterson, Mario Williams; etc

....just need a guy called Byner to play RT...

by LondonBrown on Feb 12, 2012 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I would have went Blackmon.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 12, 2012 12:27 AM EST reply actions  

Blackmon all the way if RG3 is gone. Wouldn’t be upset with Floyd with the #22 pick if Blackmon is also gone. Only reservation with Floyd is that apparently he has had 3 DUIs. Not far from an NFL suspension.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Feb 12, 2012 1:03 AM EST reply actions  

I read something about him moving into an freshman dorm to try and clean up his act, although I don’t see how that would.

"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown

by macdowellm03 on Feb 12, 2012 1:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Lol… freshman dorms are the epitome of clean livin’!

by Vududawg on Feb 13, 2012 3:24 AM EST up reply actions  

I know I certainly never got into trouble!

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2012 9:15 AM EST up reply actions  

apparently the last one was a real wake up call and he’s been an angel since

by tr1betime on Feb 12, 2012 9:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I learned about the DUIs here. I liked this draft a lot until I learned that. Now, not so much.

I don’t want to trade up for RG3. So if he’s not there, I guess I am for Blackmon now. (Maybe neither will be there?)

by DPS on Feb 12, 2012 10:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Really like the idea of Claiborne addition to an already decent D. But, not at number #4. He’s not going to score TDs.

"...and Dawggone it, people like me".

by DawgsNHawgs on Feb 12, 2012 2:18 AM EST reply actions  

Can’t leave Blackmon on the board without a trade back offer. Then, only if we’ve addressed WR and QB in free agency.

"...and Dawggone it, people like me".

by DawgsNHawgs on Feb 12, 2012 2:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Nobody is trading up for a CB or LT so you put those trade back and draft DeCastro fantasy to bed.

by HenryDawg on Feb 13, 2012 11:44 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

People would definitely trade up for a left tackle.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2012 7:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Has that ever happened?

by HenryDawg on Feb 14, 2012 9:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Baltimore traded up for Oher off the top of my head.

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 14, 2012 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL that he is now their RT.

by HenryDawg on Feb 14, 2012 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I’de rather see DE or LB upgrades since our run defense was pretty weak, but not at #4. Since trading down is highly unlikely, BPA available on offense at #4….What happens in FA will clear things up little…anyone like to see Trent Richardson in a Browns uniform? :)

by Poppawolf on Feb 12, 2012 3:15 AM EST reply actions  

anyone like to see Trent Richardson in a Browns uniform?

Later in the first. A trade up from #22 wouldn’t bother me at all. That’s only if we don’t sign Hillis.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 3:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I just dont see how RG3 wont be avail, colts are selecting luck, rams used a qb first overall a couple years ago and vikings have ponder…I see either the Rams or Vikings getting Blackmon..but if somehow RG3 is taken then Blackmon would have to be the Browns pick. Have you seen him play, he’s like Terrel Owens in his prime.

If the browns draft a qb 1st then I see them getting an OL at 22, theres also a possiblity that Richards will still be avail. or even the RB from Oregon is pretty good. I just wish the draft was next weekend

by Dawge on Feb 12, 2012 3:34 AM EST reply actions  

LaMichael James* will most likely go in the second. We could wait for him.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 3:38 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Washington will trade up to #2 or 3, giving up far more than we will for RG3. I wish the draft was next weekend too. It would put an end to all these draft speculation threads.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Feb 12, 2012 5:27 AM EST up reply actions  

I dont think there is any way Blackmon gets past us and all the way to the skins pick, unless it turns out there is more to that injury than we know today.

"There's a gleam men, there's a gleam!" Marty

by Red-Right-88 on Feb 12, 2012 5:26 AM EST reply actions  

Biggest question that I have about jining the Mock is: Are we allowed to make trades that would be realistic to what you would see on draft day? If so, I’m in and I don’t care which team. I’ll just need to know the date/time, since I work really weird hours

A bargain is something you don't need at a price you can't resist....
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong!
My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch!
Once you start agreeing with TDSH, you know that you're wrong.

by J. W. on Feb 12, 2012 8:57 AM EST reply actions  

jining joining.

A bargain is something you don't need at a price you can't resist....
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong!
My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch!
Once you start agreeing with TDSH, you know that you're wrong.

by J. W. on Feb 12, 2012 8:58 AM EST up reply actions  

I like the way you put it.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 12, 2012 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

And even as a person who doesn’t want to trade away #22, I’d still rather give that up to get RG3 than be stuck with Claiborne and Floyd.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 12, 2012 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

I have heard from the LSU crowd that Claiborne is a much better CB than Peterson – but you don’t get the extra 10 TDs on special teams. What a bunch of studs they are producing there with Peterson, Claiborne, and Honey Badger.

Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen

by realmccoy on Feb 12, 2012 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

If we needed a cornerback, I’d love to pick Claiborne. But we don’t and considering what’s likely to be on the board, I don’t think Claiborne is our best option. It pains me to say it, but I’d even rather have Trent Richardson. At least in that case, there is some potential for us to have that game changing offensive play maker.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 12, 2012 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Depends on where we think Browns is going. There’s a school of thought (which I think I’m in) that if he slows too much too play corner he has the wisdom and hitting to make a good FS.

The other side of that is he’s never played centrefield.

....just need a guy called Byner to play RT...

by LondonBrown on Feb 12, 2012 7:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Claiborne is too slow?

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 13, 2012 12:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Think he’s referring to S. Brown and his possible transition to safety.

by Vududawg on Feb 13, 2012 3:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Ah, “where Brown is going”, not “where the Browns are going”. Got it.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 13, 2012 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think Mattieu will be as good in the NFL, but they are killing it in college. Their safeties will play in the NFL too.

Claiborne is a great man-to-man cover corner, but he’s not as strong as Peterson at the line, and he isn’t the height-weight-speed combo freak that Peterson is. In man coverage down the field, Claiborne is pretty damn good.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 12, 2012 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you have enough reservations about S. Brown at corner to be ok with burning a top pick on Claiborne if other options are gone?

by Vududawg on Feb 13, 2012 3:30 AM EST up reply actions  

No I don’t. Brown isn’t amazing, but he is more than solid as a 2nd CB.

I’d take him right now over Drayton Florence, RJ Stanford, Zach Bowman, Terrance Newman, Eric Wright, Kareem Jackson, Chris Rucker, morgan trent, Benny Sapp, Lito Sheppard, Kyle Arrington, William Gay, Antoine Cason, and anyone on the Seahawks, or Rams easily.

You have about half the League’s #2 WRs that I would take him over and there are a handful (best guess, 5-6) #1 CBs I think he is better than. There are not a lot of solid QBs out there. If I’d have to guesstimate where he ranks in the league in terms of CBs, I’d say around 35th-40th in terms over 62 starters.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 13, 2012 6:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Seahawks have Brandon Browner, I would be totally fine with him. Pretty much agree on all the others though.

by HenryDawg on Feb 13, 2012 9:05 AM EST up reply actions  

is Browner their #1 or #2 though?

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 13, 2012 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow, that’s pretty generous. I admittedly have an untrained eye for evaluating DB performance, but I watched every snap this season and saw him give up more than his share of big plays, and he seemed to be the slowest player there as well as the poorest tackler.

I’m not going to argue with your assessment, but I remember (especially towards the end of the season) saying to myself more than once – Christ almighty, we need to find a replacement for Brown!!

by Vududawg on Feb 13, 2012 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Sheldon Brown had a few plays where he got beat, but you didn’t hear his name a lot which was a good thing. A while back, there was an article about how Brown was among the league leaders at DB for comp % against. He held QBs to under 50% of throws thrown his way. He made some pretty awesome plays and shut down some solid WRs.

We need to find a replacement for Brown…eventually. That guy though might be on the roster in Patterson or Skrine.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 13, 2012 3:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Good to know. I do think Patterson is pretty dependable, and Skrine is one of the more intriguing young guys on the team so i guess we’re not in too bad a shape there.

by Vududawg on Feb 14, 2012 4:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Our DB situation is the best it’s been in years. If Skrine built up a bit more muscle and smarts he could turn out.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 14, 2012 5:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Good WRs almost always beat good CBs. There are some exceptions — like Nnamdi, Bailey and Reevis — but those are the exceptions. Good CBs get beat sometimes. Brown is a good cornerback. No doubt about that. Is he elite? No. But he is good. Just because WRs score on him sometimes doesn’t change that. The rules are written for WRs.

Once you start comparing a QB to Drew Brees, you've lost the argument.

by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 13, 2012 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

If the draft was tomorrow, my board is:
1. Luck
2. RG3
3. Trade up for Luck
4. Trade up for RG3
5. Blackmon
6. Claiborne
7. Coples

Brown has been slowing down, but he’s still one of the best CBs we’ve had since returning who isn’t Joe Haden. And I’m not worried about CB2 all that much, we can find someone decent to play there. I’d be ok with leaving Haden in more man coverage and rolling safeties to help the other CB out, even.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 13, 2012 8:58 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Mine would look something like this:
1. Luck
2. RG3
3. Blackmon
4. Trade Down, gain another 1st round pick for the franchise LT that is Kalil
5. Coples
6. Richardson
7. Claiborne

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 13, 2012 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I did forget trading down. Put that right after Blackmon.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 14, 2012 1:41 AM EST up reply actions  

As soon as I read the “wait until next year” for a QB I had to ask how we would be in the position to get the guy we want. Pulling an Indy would be one way, but if we end up at anything around 4-12 again, there are going to be teams ahead of us in the draft and they aren’t going to swap spots with us just because we say please (though that is awfully civil of us).

In the scenario painted with this mock, or rather with the reasoning given for it, we would want to have some way to get back up in to the top of the draft next year and the surest way to do that would be to find a suitor to trade our #22 for their 1st in the 2013 draft. I’m not saying that I’m too keen on that idea, but if the FO is not sure that Colt is the guy (and they really shouldn’t be at this point what with the lack of anything to support such a notion) then they have to be prepared to move on and up after the 2012 season if he doesn’t cut it.

"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened."
— Winston S. Churchill
I have the best wife - ever.

by JustBob on Feb 12, 2012 6:22 PM EST up reply actions  

If RG3 and Blackmon are gone at 4 I would like to see us nab Coples, or Zach Brown to add some speed and end closing ability before going for a DB right away. 22 in my opinion should go to a solid tackle to help close the line. maybe Mike Adams from OSU? If Lfoyd goes 2nd round grab him at that time. Couldn’t hurt to help secure the base on both sides….

by Raytaliation on Feb 12, 2012 10:34 AM EST reply actions  

If this is the official SBN mock, why aren’t they consulting the mods of their respective SBN football sites before doing it?

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Feb 12, 2012 10:41 AM EST reply actions  

In this case I would go Blackmon as many have said. I do not see Claiborne as an option for us that high. That being said, what do we do if in the top 3 Luck, RG3, and Blackmon go and we cannot trade down? Seems pretty worst-case-scenario to me, but as a possibility no matter how slim. If that does happen, I would have to give strong consideration to Coples. I doubt they would choose Kalil, though I guess it “could” happen

by -bobby- on Feb 12, 2012 11:17 AM EST reply actions  

If RG3 and Blackmon are off the board, I still think we can get a great deal trading down with a franchise that needs a star LT.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 12, 2012 11:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Agree with the scenario – but if the Browns like RGIII – they will pull the trigger on the trade up.

Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen

by realmccoy on Feb 12, 2012 11:47 AM EST up reply actions  

I’d be a million times happier with that than picking Claiborne.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 12, 2012 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Trading into the 7-10 range and letting another team take Kalil would put us in an excellent spot for Coples et al.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Feb 12, 2012 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

But like I said if you cannot find a bidder then what? do you take “less” then perceived value to get out of the spot? or if you are truly stuck at 4 and no QB or Blackmon available, what do you do?

by -bobby- on Feb 12, 2012 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

But like I said if you cannot find a bidder then what?

Kalil is the best LT in the draft. I can’t picture a scenario no team is willing to trade up for him.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 12, 2012 1:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Forgive me, but I just can’t look at having the #4 overall pick as being “stuck.” Even in a worse case scenario, we’re in position to draft someone that can have an immediate impact on our team. If we don’t trade up for RG3, and he, Luck, and Blackmon are all gone, we pick who we think is the BPA, then get excited about our next 1st round pick.

We are in a beautiful draft position, regardless of what we do with the picks.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 12, 2012 3:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d say the chances of both RG3 and Blackmon being gone are less than 5%. I’d say not being able to find a trade partner for the best LT prospect since JT would also be less than 5%.

So imo, the chances of this scenario happening are about .2%.

What if Luck falls to us? I think that even though it’s highly unlikely, it is more unlikely than this scenario.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 12, 2012 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

The Apocalypse will occur if Luck isn’t picked first. Teams will start trying to give up 3 first rounders to trade with the Rams.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I doubt it, teams aren’t going to give up a lot to get Kalil when they can take Rieff or Martin for free. Someone will trade up to 2 for Griffin and that should be us.

by HenryDawg on Feb 13, 2012 11:50 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I would probably go Coples. As much as I think there will be someone to trade down with for Kalil, I wouldn’t be terribly upset with Coples or Ingram. Claiborne would probably be next on my list, then Kuelechy (I know, I know, he doesn’t rush the passer), and then I’d really be searching for the next guy on the board.

The next few guys I would consider are either semi-positional mis-matches for us (Upshaw, Barron) or places where we don’t really have a need that matches up with that position (Kalil, Reiff, Martin, Still, Brockers).

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 12, 2012 3:12 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I think we will see a Linebacker picked with one of our first 3 picks. That area seems to be the oldest and could use an infusion of youth.

Yes im a troll. Yes I hate everyone. Yes I like Colt McCoy. Yes Im 4 years old. Yes I get butt hurt. Deal with it.

by dirtyjoe on Feb 12, 2012 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

I just dont see how RGIII wont be there at four. If the rams trade down with anyone except us, then its kind of a toss-up as to who will be avaliable for them. If the rams do trade down with say washington, then Blackmon will still be there. I do not like this mock at all.

by FrenchToast979 on Feb 12, 2012 1:04 PM EST via Android app reply actions  

Would much rather have Griffin than another DB or WR w/ issues (Floyd). Trading the 22 pick doesn’t concern me if it means we get a high quality QB. But I understand how some feel that would just be wasting the gift of a second 1st round pick, but I try not to look at it that way.

I think it makes sense to lean towards offense in the draft while addressing the D through free agency…. not strictly though.

DB is up there on the list of priorities, but I don’t think its at the very top. Heckert did a good job at getting Patterson in here… hope he can hit on another good secondary player through FA.

"A drug person can learn to cope with things like seeing their dead grandmother crawling up their leg with a knife in her teeth. But no one should be asked to handle this trip." Thompson

by LocalMan on Feb 12, 2012 2:14 PM EST reply actions  

The secondary isn’t a big enough concern to use early draft picks on. A DE and LB is really a priority in the first 3 rounds.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 12, 2012 2:30 PM EST up reply actions  

This.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 12, 2012 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed, especially on LB.

"A drug person can learn to cope with things like seeing their dead grandmother crawling up their leg with a knife in her teeth. But no one should be asked to handle this trip." Thompson

by LocalMan on Feb 12, 2012 5:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I not only expect that we will all wear each other out with this subject between now and the draft, I also expect to enjoy it because when it comes to the Browns, I am not sane, I am not even an adult.

That said, my hope for this draft is that it can be like 1978 when we got Matthews at 12 and Newsome at 23. Now I realize I am biased because those two are tied for No. 2, after Jim Brown, as my favorite Browns of all time, but I know that adding two guys who were not only outstanding players, but outstanding people, made the Browns a better team for years. The Browns have enough spaces to fill that if they could only fill two of them with players of that caliber, I think we will all be very happy.

The worst thing, the cruelest thing, to give to a Cleveland sports fan is hope.

by JamesPowell on Feb 12, 2012 5:31 PM EST reply actions  

when it comes to the Browns, I am not sane, I am not even an adult.

My avatar agrees with one of your choices for top brown too.

....just need a guy called Byner to play RT...

by LondonBrown on Feb 12, 2012 7:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I heard Pluto saying that he learned “from sources” that the Browns were thinking of going defense. He specifically mentioned Claiborne and I believe Couples.I’d have to find the interview again re Couples but for sure Claiborne.

Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war

by Kaner on Feb 12, 2012 6:01 PM EST reply actions  

Double dawg smokescreen: they’re going to trade down from four, then use those picks to trade back up to four and pick Claiborne.

"We just lost to the Steelers 20 hours ago and that still hurts. I need to get home and eat a burrito." -Phil Dawson

by Adrock2099 on Feb 12, 2012 6:12 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I would love to see a DE with top-5 talent on our line. Sheard is good, but throw a top-5 guy on the other side…wow.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 12, 2012 6:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Is there one? Coples seems like the best but he disappears at times, that’s not good. I would try to trade back to 10-15 and take Mercillus, pick up an extra 2nd rounder and whatever else you can get for trading back 10 spots. Hopefully another #1 next year.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 6:27 PM EST up reply actions  

From what I read he was consistent in his junior year but for some reason (coaching churn?) didn’t commit last year. Still a red flag though. If he commits to the team… whoa.

Mercillus looks good too. I think our new 4-3 needs more DL to excel; I think we might be thin at LB but we have three capable starters and one reasonable situational player (maiava).

....just need a guy called Byner to play RT...

by LondonBrown on Feb 12, 2012 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I think I read somewhere he moved inside in his junior year to DT, which is interesting that he could be stout enough in the middle but still have the athleticism to play the outside. I wonder if he frog stance?

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, what I hear about Coples scares the crap out of me too, despite the skillset.

by Vududawg on Feb 13, 2012 3:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Terry Pluto spoke of Clairborne and this:

2. But this week, I keep hearing defensive end — namely Quinton Coples. I wonder how much of this has to do with Couples having a monster week at the Senior Bowl and the fact that Jayme Mitchell proved that he was not a starter last season. They have no one else at the opposite end from Jabaal Sheard. ESPN’s Mel Kiper on the North Carolina product: “Bouncing back from a so-so season, he is dominating Senior Bowl practices. The skill set is hard to look past. The physical traits and talent are there; it’s more a matter of consistency. Great size and length to hold the edge as a 4-3 defensive end.”

Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war

by Kaner on Feb 12, 2012 7:46 PM EST reply actions  

I thought this was a good brief introduction to Coples and the dilemma regarding whether or not he’s a top ten pick.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Feb 12, 2012 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Interesting post. But if the article is accurate, there is no way you can spend the number 4 overall on a guy with questionable motor and passion. One thing I did enjoy about Manginini was his green sticker concept. Take chances late, get green stickers at number 4 overall.

Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen

by realmccoy on Feb 12, 2012 8:06 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s everyone else that’s bad at driving, not me!

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2012 9:16 AM EST up reply actions  

AND THEY JUST CHANGED THE MOCK AGAIN. Who on earth is responsible for these every-few-days mocks, and why do they keep giving us bad picks?

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Feb 13, 2012 3:24 PM EST reply actions  

If you have an entire website dedicated to mockingthedraft, I would assume you might as well need daily mocks.

by Roger Dorn on Feb 13, 2012 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

My favorite part is where they use Micheal Lombardi as the reason to declare the Redskins as the “favorite” to trade up for RG3.

Has Micheal Lombardi ever gotten something correct?

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 13, 2012 4:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Has Micheal Lombardi ever gotten something correct?

Excellent question. He is Grossiesque in his wrongness.

Once you start comparing a QB to Drew Brees, you've lost the argument.

by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 13, 2012 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Grossi down, Hoynes to go.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 13, 2012 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Let’s hope that trend continues. I see no reason it should change.

by HenryDawg on Feb 13, 2012 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

On the subject of Floyd and not drinking and driving, I saw a good comparison for him. Kenny Britt.

Neither one had elite footspeed coming out though Britt had a good 40 at the combine. People also thought Britt had character concerns coming out of college and was a bit of a diva. He was also banged up a bit in college.

In his case, injuries and run-ins with the law have plagued his career so far. Floyd is definitely a risk that high, but a good talent. He could end up being the player Britt is (though I think Britt is a little more athletic) or the player Britt has shown he might be if the distractions don’t get in the way.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 13, 2012 9:35 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Cleveland_browns_super_bowl_banner_11217big_small
A new USFL/NFL D League?
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / @# / !@
Small
Top 5 Bubble Players
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Buddhathomas_small
Cleveland Browns 2012 Prediction - A Sailor's Perspective
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / !^ / !@
Cribbs_small
2012 Rookie Predictions
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
A look of the 2012 Browns O-line
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / ( / !@
00000021_small
browns Q for 12 who are they

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Funny-good-times-11_small Bernie19Kosar

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Hadenward-new2_small Jon @ DBN

Moderators

N3tdgy_medium_small Brownie's Year

Polar_cap_of_mars_planet_small notthatnoise