Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Results: Junior dos Santos TKO's Frank Mir

Cleveland Browns to Have About $29 Million in Cap Space?

Carry-over cap space from 2011 gives teams more money to spend in 2012.

Note: The figures in this post come from several different sources. If I have the correct interpretation, I have combined them to project how much cap space the Cleveland Browns will have for the 2012-2013 NFL season.

First, let's get to the sources of how much cap space the Browns were believed to have available heading into this offseason. This might get confusing to read in paragraph format, so I'll lay my thought process out bullet-by-bullet.

Star-divide

  • Salary Cap for 2012: About a week ago, the Sun Sentinel projected that the NFL salary cap would be about $124 million in 2012. An exact amount should be released within the next week or two, but it should range anywhere between $121-$125 million.
  • How Much is Cleveland Under the Cap? The Sun Sentinel reports that the Browns have already invested $103.78 million for 2012. If you take the difference between $124 million and that amount, it means that the Browns are about $20.21 million under the cap. Going by this amount, the Browns have the 11th highest amount of money to spend in 2012. Just for another reference, ESPN projected that the Browns would be $21 million under the cap.
  • The "Carry-Over" from 2011: Remember that weird lockout last season that kind of...tweaked a few of the rules? Well, it appears that teams who did not utilize their full cap space in 2011 can carry that unused space over to 2012, inflating the amount of available cap space significantly in some cases. Here is an explanation from PFT:
    Under Article 13, Section 6(b)(v) of the CBA, each team may carry over any remaining cap room from one year to the next by submitting written notice, signed by the owner of the team, to the league office no later than 14 days before the start of the next league year. The written notice must indicate the maximum amount of cap room that the team wishes to shift from one cap year to the next.
    30 teams opted to take advantage of this. The Texans and Chargers did not because of not having excess cap space from 2011 available, I believe.

  • What is the Browns' Carry-Over from 2011? According to Pro Football Talk, the Browns are carrying over $8.98 million from 2011.
  • Putting it All Together: When you take the amount that the Browns are under the cap (~$20.21 million) and the carry-over from 2011 ($8.98 million) and add them together, the Browns could have about $29.19 million available to spend this offseason. I don't know where they ranks them compared to the rest of the league, but I imagine that it would still put them close to 11th place.

The Browns at a minimum have to set aside $5 million for rookies, according to the Sun Sentinel. Since the Browns have two first-round picks, that amount could be higher. Still, having around $23 million to spend on free agents should be more than enough to retain the likes of D'Qwell Jackson and whoever else the team intends to bring back, while also making a splash in signing other teams' free agents.

Comment 34 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

WoW!

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 15, 2012 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Is it this year or next year that we have to hit a certain percentage of the cap?

by Brownie's Year on Feb 14, 2012 6:49 PM EST reply actions  

Next year per PFT

Though some thought that carrying over cap space would increase the per-team minimum spending requirement that debuts in 2013, the 89-percent floor comes only from the unadjusted cap.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 14, 2012 6:56 PM EST up reply actions  

That makes a lot more sense to me.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 15, 2012 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I was looking at some of those cap figures myself and two things struck me. One, that the Steelers were the furthest over the cap at almost $150 million. And two, the Patriots are 3 places lower on the cap scale list that we are. Obviously the Steelers have got some serious trimming to do. And you have to give Belichick some props for knowing how to manage the cap and the draft process.

This post has been previewed and approved by me.

by Kaner on Feb 14, 2012 8:42 PM EST reply actions  

It’s pretty easy to stay under the cap when your entire defensive backfield is filled with guys off the street.

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 15, 2012 10:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Still, having around $23 million to spend on free agents should be more than enough to retain the likes of D’Qwell Jackson, Phil Dawson, and whoever else the team intends to bring back, while also making a splash in signing other team’s free agents.

Sorry Chris, you had a typo I couldn’t let slip by.

Honor. Courage. Commitment.

by Brownsbacker488 on Feb 14, 2012 10:35 PM EST reply actions  

Are you referring to the dollar amount? The $23 million was intentional when you subtract the rookie amount of $5 million (which I bumped up to account for an extra first-round pick).

I do see a typo of team’s versus teams’, which I have corrected. I just assumed that wouldn’t be the type of typo you intended to point out. Although…since I pointed it out, you have plausible deniability when it comes to the dollar amount, and you can just say you were referring to team’s. hmmm…

Dawgs By Nature - Covering the Cleveland Browns on SB Nation.

by Chris Pokorny on Feb 15, 2012 8:23 AM EST up reply actions  

He’s just professing his love for Phil Dawson, whom you did not include specifically above.

"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein

by rufio on Feb 15, 2012 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Ah, I didn’t catch that until you pointed it out. I’m with Brownsbacker488. Pay Phil ‘Automatic’ Dawson.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 15, 2012 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Meanwhile the Bucs got a whopping $63,000,000 to roll over.

by crazyL80 on Feb 14, 2012 10:54 PM EST reply actions  

I think they’ll get Williams. They need him and can afford him.

by HenryDawg on Feb 15, 2012 10:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Cincy has like 60 mil also.

by -bobby- on Feb 15, 2012 6:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Good thing their owner is a complete tight ass who will never spend money.

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 15, 2012 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

He has to next year… maybe it starts a year early…

by -bobby- on Feb 16, 2012 12:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Plus, we will be able to move around some guys money.

I’m sure Thomas and Rubin both have high numbers because of their new deals. The Browns have been pretty good at being out in front of things like this.

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 15, 2012 10:47 AM EST reply actions  

I’ve been critical of them in the past for what I felt was not doing enough in free agency. My hope is that they were sort of planning on this perfect storm. Like a coup is on the way.

That’s what I’m hoping for anyway.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 15, 2012 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m more excited for the offseason than normal. Most years we expect some turnover and adding a few nice pieces. We have the ammo in the form of picks and cash to totally remake this team.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 15, 2012 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I still have my FA skepticism, mostly from the inaction of Holmgren in his few years as Browns Pres.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 15, 2012 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I am slightly as well, but after last season, I would not be surprised if slightly warming seats spur H&H into at least some measured action to show some improvement on the field.

by ouched on Feb 15, 2012 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I would hope that’s not the reason they spend FA dollars.

by HenryDawg on Feb 15, 2012 9:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I hope this changes this year…shudder…

by Poppawolf on Feb 15, 2012 10:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I doubt it, I think they just understand that you have to base line your operation with draft picks before bringing in the good dollar FAs. I think we need to just be patient.

by HenryDawg on Feb 15, 2012 9:49 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we need to just be patient.

Yeah, yeah. We’ve been hearing that cop out since 1999.

by Jon @ DBN on Feb 16, 2012 1:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, in fairness, we haven’t done it.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 16, 2012 10:31 AM EST up reply actions  

My optimist view has been that they are focusing on a youth movement, which immediately disqualified a lot of FAs from consideration. That and they were still in the process of evaluating the team in the Shurmer WCO.

Despite the rotten luck we’ve had with past big name FAs under Savage (Bentley (shudder…), Rogers, Baxter) I agree the time is right to make a splash. There are several young(ish) players that would instantly make us dangerous at their respective position groups.

In a dream world I would like to see Mario Williams, Colston/S. Johnson, and a good OL. Hell, while i’m at it throw in Dashon Goldsen so he can knock some stealers unconscious like he did Pierre Thomas.

by Vududawg on Feb 16, 2012 3:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Despite the rotten luck we’ve had with past big name FAs under Savage

That wasn’t rotten luck. That was worse.

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 16, 2012 9:25 AM EST up reply actions  

PIT still 10 mil over, and carrying over a whopping 1/2 mil from last year. Hell yeah…
Ravens look to be right between our figure and PIT’s.

Really tho, discussions of these #s seem a bit premature with all the contract negotions and FA signings yet to be conducted.

by Vududawg on Feb 15, 2012 10:53 AM EST reply actions  

Never a bad thing that they’re in cap trouble. They have at least 3-4 guys reworking their contracts, which is nice for them, but not a very good long term strategy, its just a band aid. I hope our guys stay out of those situations as much as possible.

by HenryDawg on Feb 15, 2012 9:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Cleveland_browns_super_bowl_banner_11217big_small
A new USFL/NFL D League?
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / @# / !@
Small
Top 5 Bubble Players
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Buddhathomas_small
Cleveland Browns 2012 Prediction - A Sailor's Perspective
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / !^ / !@
Cribbs_small
2012 Rookie Predictions
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
A look of the 2012 Browns O-line
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / ( / !@
00000021_small
browns Q for 12 who are they

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Funny-good-times-11_small Bernie19Kosar

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Hadenward-new2_small Jon @ DBN

Moderators

N3tdgy_medium_small Brownie's Year

Polar_cap_of_mars_planet_small notthatnoise