McShay: Browns have to trade up for RG3

Technically they don't "have to" Todd McLeprechaun...but will they? Like sands in the hourglass, these are the Days of Our Browns...

3 months ago Kosar19 8 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Don’t care for McShay too much – but he is right on here. If he is the stud people think he is – for sure we will have to trade up to get him. What do people expect, for Heckert to sit on his hands and hope the QB he needs slips to him?

Change isn't good or bad it just "is". Don Draper of Madmen

by realmccoy on Feb 18, 2012 2:08 PM EST reply actions

RG3 is a fit for Murmur and our plodding West Coast offense? Which by the way, has been very offensive. So not sure how Heckert “needs” RG3. Is the Walrus willing to change his philosophy? You can’t teach an old “Dawg” new tricks.

Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein - Joe Theismann
Follow @Buckeyes_1

by Kosar19 on Feb 18, 2012 5:58 PM EST reply actions

Have you watched much football?

by HenryDawg on Feb 18, 2012 8:48 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs

Congratulations on making a name for yourself.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 19, 2012 6:29 PM EST up reply actions

McShay said we’ll have to?

Great! That means he’ll be there at 4.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Feb 18, 2012 7:55 PM EST reply actions

Ok I am totally for giving up pick 22 to get him at 2. At first I was in only if he falls to 4, but so many of you are right in saying if he is the guy then why not give up that pick and I agree. We haven’t had a good QB since Bernie and its time we do what it takes to get one. For the record cant i stand McShay and think he is an arrogant ass and hear that many people within his profession feel the same about him.

by 27BUCKEYE27 on Feb 19, 2012 12:49 PM EST reply actions