Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Veterans Share Favorite Sports Memories

How much longer for our Browns to play in and win a Superbowl?

I was born 2 hours exactly after the Browns beat the Colts on December 27, 1964. Our last NFL Championship. My dad (who was a devoted Browns fan his whole life) each year the Browns failed to make it to the Superbowl blamed it on me and called me Jinx the Cat. There have been teams like the Chicago Cubs in MLB (1908) with a 103 year drought or Toronto Maple Leafs in the NHL (1967) with a 44 year drought that are still on going, but somehow because we have been so close and so many times it felt like a Superbowl birth and win should happen, it is more painful to us. It feels like it will never happen. (Screw all the jerks who say a Cleveland Browns team did win a Superbowl in 2000 as the Baltimore Ravens, I want to actually punch those people) My question to everyone is how long do you think till the Cleveland Browns break through and make it to a Superbowl and win a Superbowl?

Poll
When will the Cleveland Browns be in a Superbowl?
1-3 years
35 votes
3-5 years
80 votes
By 2020
55 votes
Not with this Front Office
14 votes
Never (we are jinxed)
31 votes

215 votes | Poll has closed

This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.

Comment 130 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Maybe with a quarteback and outside Linebacker we will have a better shot. I like Heckert, Holmgren eh, Shurmur jury is still out. Childress is a good coach, I say with in 5 years if they get a quarterback

by lou.brissie on Feb 5, 2012 12:32 PM EST reply actions  

I said 3 to 5 years. But I like your prediction better

by lou.brissie on Feb 5, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Acorrding to Betty white, next year is a sure thing!

Lifes A Dance, You Learn As You Go!

by findlaybrownslover on Feb 6, 2012 11:43 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

How are you figuring the Browns make the playoffs with teams in our division?

by kamasutraman_007 on Feb 6, 2012 7:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m guessing we will beat them.

400-0.

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 6, 2012 7:43 PM EST up reply actions  

7-5

"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden

by Kimble_79 on Feb 7, 2012 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

11-5

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 7, 2012 8:49 PM EST up reply actions  

This is a rare case where the all caps actually adds to the humor. Rec.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 10, 2012 8:15 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s a tough one to call. I went with 3-5 years because I think that in 3 years we will be a regular playoff team. But man… The Super Bowl is just a whole different animal. There have only been 13 different teams in the Super Bowl in the last 10 years. There are plenty of really well-run teams, but even they aren’t guaranteed a Super Bowl in the next 3-5 years.

by shep615 on Feb 5, 2012 12:56 PM EST reply actions  

About 50 years ago.

XBL - TheRabbit087. Get at me.

by SpecialBrownie on Feb 5, 2012 12:56 PM EST reply actions  

lol

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

by pwndabear on Feb 5, 2012 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d rather have a Superbowl birth berth instead

"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown

by macdowellm03 on Feb 10, 2012 8:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Me too. I took the logical choice that allows room for mistake.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 5, 2012 4:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Not until we get a Quarterback.

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 5, 2012 4:14 PM EST reply actions  

we get RG3 next year and boom, Simms is correct with that 365 days.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 7, 2012 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

As long as I live to see one, I’m good. I’m only 17 and saying that is still a stretch.

by tr1betime on Feb 5, 2012 10:43 PM EST reply actions  

You made me feel old. Do you know how hard that is?

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 7, 2012 8:50 PM EST up reply actions  

No one is old when compared to the universe. I’ll be young even when I’m 80. Assuming I live that long…

Honor. Courage. Commitment.

by Brownsbacker488 on Feb 8, 2012 1:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I took 1-3 years, & screw all of you who don’t believe. I’m not very far behind shep (within 2 years) and as far back as I can remember I was a Browns fan. If things are done right, by the time the 4th to 5th year of the Holmgren/Heckert front office, we can be there. Just have to find a way to max out the draft picks the next two drafts and finish off the Defensive build, while recreating the offense. There is a way, but most fans don’t like to hear it, and I’ve already stated it a billion zillion times.

A bargain is something you don't need at a price you can't resist....
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong!
My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch!

by J. W. on Feb 6, 2012 10:39 AM EST reply actions  

I like the thought of building a defense, A dominanting defense!

by champion64 on Feb 6, 2012 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

You’ve got to be able to score to win. We need some offence.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Feb 7, 2012 1:10 AM EST up reply actions  

If we had a front office that could use FA and the draft to build, I might go 6 yrs. That is just not the case. The Browns have been trying to build through the draft for 10 years. We have no Quarterback, no wrs, no running game, no run defense and that defense is not feared by anyone. The new league favors athletic qbs with any arm. We can draft one, but most Browns fans here still want to add filler and not impact.

by kamasutraman_007 on Feb 6, 2012 7:12 PM EST up reply actions  

but most Browns fans here still want to add filler and not impact.

I wouldn’t say most, I’d just say a very vocal minority. I want a game-changer.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 6, 2012 7:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Me too.
We seem to have some people around who are obsessed with trading back.

I'm entitled to my opinion. Especially if I'm wrong.

by Aussie Brown on Feb 7, 2012 1:12 AM EST up reply actions  

I want more than one game changer. I want a group of game changers!

A bargain is something you don't need at a price you can't resist....
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong!
My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch!
Once you start agreeing with TDSH, you know that you're wrong.

by J. W. on Feb 10, 2012 7:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Like, say, Greg Little, Jordan Norwood, and Momass, who are all likely to be significantly better with a great QB?

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 10, 2012 8:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Little played better with Wallace at QB. That says a lot.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 8:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Honestly, it amazes me how not everyone sees this stuff.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 10, 2012 8:38 PM EST up reply actions  

They don’t really watch the games?

by HenryDawg on Feb 10, 2012 9:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Armchairs don’t really know the game.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s an insult to armchairs.

by HenryDawg on Feb 10, 2012 11:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I know some OK armchairs. Those damn rocking chairs are all a bunch of dirty thieves though.

"We just lost to the Steelers 20 hours ago and that still hurts. I need to get home and eat a burrito." -Phil Dawson

by Adrock2099 on Feb 11, 2012 2:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Have any of these guys ever showed a hint at being a game changer?

A bargain is something you don't need at a price you can't resist....
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong!
My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch!
Once you start agreeing with TDSH, you know that you're wrong.

by J. W. on Feb 11, 2012 3:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Little and Norwood both had multiple 50+ yard plays so yes.

by HenryDawg on Feb 11, 2012 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

also why not have some game changing WR’s (as in more than one ) to go along with a game changing QB? We dont have any of those type of WR’s currently on the Browns (Little has a chance to be a solid #2). So what type of WR goes with the QB that everyone wants???

A bargain is something you don't need at a price you can't resist....
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong!
My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch!
Once you start agreeing with TDSH, you know that you're wrong.

by J. W. on Feb 11, 2012 3:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Sweet Fancy Moses, this.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 11, 2012 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Why do people argue against this?

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Feb 12, 2012 11:00 AM EST up reply actions  

The part I find confusing is when they think that because we get a top QB we also can’t have a good O-Line or defense. You have to have all of them to be competitive but its a lot easier to find OLBs and RTs in rounds 2-4 than it is a franchise QB.

by HenryDawg on Feb 12, 2012 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Who said we can’t get more WRs?

by HenryDawg on Feb 11, 2012 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Right? There’s more than one round in this draft, I’m pretty sure. I’ll double check.

Steel Nick

by nickjs21 on Feb 11, 2012 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m afraid we’ll throw a boatload of cash at a player like Garcon and come to the realization he was only good because of Manning!We not only need a QB that can get the WRs the ball but also make the pre snap reads along with the ability or authority to make an audible! Just dreamin’!

Where taking the BROWNS to the SUPERBOWL is not a joke,but a life's passion!

by ctowndawgpound on Feb 11, 2012 10:31 AM EST up reply actions  

1. Garcon probably won’t be a bank breaker
2. He can stretch a field
3. Our QBs can audible

by HenryDawg on Feb 11, 2012 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

My audible comment is to alot of criticisms I heard earlier in the year about Colt not being able to.

Where taking the BROWNS to the SUPERBOWL is not a joke,but a life's passion!

by ctowndawgpound on Feb 11, 2012 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I know, but those were proven to be false. It was just dumb fans making stuff up because they have nothing better to do than yell about Shurmur and Holmgren being awful.

by HenryDawg on Feb 11, 2012 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry wasn’t saying you were one of the dumb fans, just that the shouters can be quite effective at spreading a false meme.

by HenryDawg on Feb 11, 2012 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

RG3 and Kendall Wright. Add Little into the mix, and you have a nice group

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 11, 2012 4:23 AM EST up reply actions  

And with Norwood as your slot,this might make one of our weaker positions into more of a strength of the team.

Where taking the BROWNS to the SUPERBOWL is not a joke,but a life's passion!

by ctowndawgpound on Feb 11, 2012 10:35 AM EST up reply actions  

If you can get one guy who is either fast enough or big enough to draw and succeed against double teams you’ve instantly improved every receiver on the team.

by HenryDawg on Feb 11, 2012 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

The Browns have been trying to build through the draft for 10 years.

but only until Heckert did we have a guy running the draft who had been successful before at running a draft. We should ignore previous regimes because they are nothing like this one.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 7, 2012 2:49 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

I agree with this, With Heckert things look and seem different. I am trusting him

by champion64 on Feb 7, 2012 4:45 PM EST up reply actions  

They do look and seem different, as they should. Not even a comparison. Butch was a HC/gm who sucked at both, Savage was a glorified scout, Kokinis was a pawn of mangini, and Dwight Clark just sucked.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 7, 2012 5:38 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

1999-Butch Davis

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 7, 2012 9:47 PM EST up reply actions  

but only until Heckert did we have a guy running the draft who had been successful before at running a draft. We should ignore previous regimes because they are nothing like this one.

Isn’t that a cop-out? With the mangini regime weren’t people saying “this regime isn’t like the last”? Weren’t people saying the previous regimes were “nothing like” crennel and savage? wasn’t kokinis qualified alsowhen he came on-board?

Every regime is supposedly better than the last. And after it’s over, they’re always lumped with the previous ones.

by The Licensed Pessimist on Feb 9, 2012 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I was “MANGINA SUCKS” from the start. I did like Butch and Romeo though.

The hump we have to get over is the regression year. Say we surprise everyone and win 10 games this year. Then in 2013 we got 4-10 again. We have to avoid the temptation to run another crew out of town. Look at the Bungles, for all Mike Brown does to ruin them, keeping coaching consistency after a 4 win year after a playoff run and they’re back in the playoffs with a rookie QB.

by HenryDawg on Feb 9, 2012 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

If Romeo had our current front office, there may have been a good chance it could have worked. The current front office of ours is the best we’ve had since a few years before the desporia to maryland.

A bargain is something you don't need at a price you can't resist....
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong!
My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch!
Once you start agreeing with TDSH, you know that you're wrong.

by J. W. on Feb 10, 2012 7:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Totally agree. It’s also the least dysfunctional.

by HenryDawg on Feb 10, 2012 7:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Romeo wouldn’t be here with this current FO. He’s from a different system.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I am not a Shurmur fan, but I don’t think he will be as bad as a coach as RAC. I liked Romeo as a coordinator and he could scheme well, but he just couldn’t control the players.

He ran a zoo…and that’s an insult to zoos because at least the animals were trained and contained.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 11, 2012 4:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Shurmur uses guys like JT, DQ and Fujita to control the locker room and its an approach I personally like.

by HenryDawg on Feb 11, 2012 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

agreed

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 11, 2012 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I remember exactly no one on this board being excited about Kokinis. No one. Keep up the bullsh1t rocland.

Once you start comparing a QB to Drew Brees, you've lost the argument.

by TheDriveStillHurts on Feb 10, 2012 12:22 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I never stated anyone was “excited” about Kokinis. Keep up your reading comprehension TDSH

by The Licensed Pessimist on Feb 10, 2012 9:12 PM EST up reply actions  

With the mangini regime weren’t people saying "this regime isn’t like the last"?

A lot of people here hated the Mangini hire from day one.

"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway

by notthatnoise on Feb 11, 2012 12:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Isn’t that a cop-out?

nope

mangini regime weren’t people saying "this regime isn’t like the last"? Weren’t people saying the previous regimes were "nothing like" crennel and savage

yeah, but that was not the point I was making. Sure all of those guys were “nothing like” the previous guys, but that wasn’t always a good thing.

Kokinis might have been somewhat “qualified”, but he was never involved in the draft process. Savage was more qualified, but he had never been “the guy” in an organization like Heckert was.

Whatever you want to say about Reid’s decision making on drafts, Heckert WAS a general manager for close to a decade. The most you can say about any of the previous guys is that Savage was the gms assistant on draft issues for 2 years.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 10, 2012 3:55 AM EST up reply actions  

The specific previous position of the GM is pretty irrelevant when it comes to future impact and success isn’t it? Considering the entire drafting process involved everyone under the personnel team, a GM could have previously been a scout as long as he makes the right decisions. No different than a former coordinator becoming a head coach.

I personally like Heckert more than any other GM so far, but if he flames out, then people are probably going to look back at his decisions the same way you look back at all of the other ones. And then the next GM is going to be “different than the rest”

by The Licensed Pessimist on Feb 10, 2012 9:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Did we ever have a GM before with previous GM experience?

Wouldn’t that alone make Heckert different than the rest?

by Bernie19Kosar on Feb 10, 2012 10:38 PM EST up reply actions  

EXACTLY

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 11, 2012 4:24 AM EST up reply actions  

There is a whole lot of difference between becoming a scout and a gm. It’s like being a coordinator and a HC. Some guys eventually do transition from good scout to good gm (like good coordinator to good HC), but none of those coordinators/scouts were proven commodities.

Heckert as gm would be like if we had gotten Gruden as HC. Both were experienced and did good jobs at the position…except that if anything, Heckert had a better track record.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 11, 2012 4:26 AM EST up reply actions  

We have a FO that is finally worth a damn and is trying to get the ship back on course. Did you miss the links and posts on here about how Holmgren told Randy Lerner before even taking the job this could be a 5-7yr fix? How does Holmgren/Heckert have anything to do with the moves we have made over the last 10yrs? I get so fed up listening to dumba$$es screaming about how we have been building for 1013* years and I want change now, blah, blah, blah. If you want a team that can compete year in and year out, you have to have good drafts and build the team up. Once your competing, then you can grab good FA players to mix in with your draft picks to maintain your talent level. Holmgren/Heckert is doing a hell of a job if you ask me. Drafting hasn’t been a Cleveland strong point since we have returned until these two guys showed up. So why don’t you do a “reverse dog” and go root for buffalo.

"They kept throwing it at me. I don’t know why. They just kept trying, and I just kept knocking it down." -- Joe Haden

by Kimble_79 on Feb 7, 2012 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

The other part of this is also not giving up on players if they aren’t all pros after a year or two and the other part is being able to keep and develop the depth you acquire later in the draft. They do an excellent job of both.

by HenryDawg on Feb 7, 2012 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Does that mean that you want to develop McCoy for another year? As a Starter?

A bargain is something you don't need at a price you can't resist....
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong!
My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch!
Once you start agreeing with TDSH, you know that you're wrong.

by J. W. on Feb 10, 2012 7:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Not with Griffin out there. If it was someone average like Jones, then yeah I would stick with McCoy. Otherwise now is the time to get an elite QB and Griffin has shown he has all the skills and traits of a great QB. Talent + obsession + intelligence is deadly.

by HenryDawg on Feb 10, 2012 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

You start Griffin right away. If he’s going to fail let him do it early and progress.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 7:39 PM EST up reply actions  

This.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 10, 2012 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree, I was meaning not with Griffin available to us in the draft. If we didn’t have the ability to draft a QB of his skills I would not be as gung ho on going all in on Tannehill.

by HenryDawg on Feb 10, 2012 9:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I was agreeing with you. Colt better start if we don’t get Griffin.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 9:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Unless he needs a half a season to digest the offense and learn the speed of the game. I am for a QB competition, but not giving RG3 the job. This would be Colt’s 3rd year in the league, 2nd in the same system. He isn’t great, but there is a decent chance he could beat out RG3 for opening day.

I teach good life choices. That's why I almost didn't graduate high school.

http://www.prosportsblogging.com/author/bross09/

Like DBN on Facebook

by bross09 on Feb 11, 2012 4:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Thats building a quality core of players, then slowly over time, replacing them when they either leave (ala FA) or retire. We are on our way there and I would love to shave off a year or two. I believe the move made last year by trading back may have gained us a year – we did pick up some core quality players. Thats why I say probably two more years of building the core. It’s just like building up the NCO corps in the military, thats where the majority of the knowledge and hard work come from.

A bargain is something you don't need at a price you can't resist....
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong!
My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch!
Once you start agreeing with TDSH, you know that you're wrong.

by J. W. on Feb 10, 2012 7:13 PM EST up reply actions  

People talk about building inside out, and I agree with that. But what I don’t see is why they don’t think we can add skill players because we’ve completed 90% of the OL and DL. We have the best LT ever, a pro bowl center and LG, and up and coming pair of RGs and we just need a RT. On the other side we’re 3/4s solid, decent depth players, just need to add one big pass rusher on the right side and then continue to improve said depth.

by HenryDawg on Feb 10, 2012 7:27 PM EST up reply actions  

The Browns have been trying to build through the draft for 10 years.

But that doesn’t help when each new regime we have ends up cutting most of the draft picks we’ve already selected. Where we benefit the most now is that we have a true direction on offense and defense. Maybe not our defenses so much, but with Butch Davis, Phil Savage, and Eric Mangini there never seemed to be a real system we were trying to incorporate which led to having a melting pot of different system players.

Honor. Courage. Commitment.

by Brownsbacker488 on Feb 8, 2012 12:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Thats the point, H & H are trying to build the Browns version of the NCO corps, and every fan should support this. Any person ever associated with the military knows this is the best way to go.

A bargain is something you don't need at a price you can't resist....
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong!
My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch!
Once you start agreeing with TDSH, you know that you're wrong.

by J. W. on Feb 10, 2012 7:16 PM EST up reply actions  

The other thing you have to think about is all these teams like the Steelers and Colts are all desperate because they’re over the cap. I just heard some of the Steelers players are “restructuring” their contracts to help them (typical cheaters). You have to be careful not to kill yourself with the cap. It would be awesome to have 5 top 10 players on the Oline but this isn’t the 1980s, you have to spend the money on the key positions – LT, QB, 1 WR, 1 CB and DEs, and maybe an elite Safety. But you have to find value elsewhere.

by HenryDawg on Feb 10, 2012 7:30 PM EST up reply actions  

some of the Steelers players are "restructuring" their contracts to help them (typical cheaters).

haha

by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

We’ve drafted crap for 10/12 years.

by HenryDawg on Feb 10, 2012 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

We will win in the 4th first year guaranteed!

by SBP on Feb 6, 2012 12:24 PM EST reply actions  

1 to 3 years

I am going with 1 to 3 years…..depending if we could get Peyton or Flynn and get some good draft picks to make our offense relevant again. I haven’t seen a Peyton post related to the Browns, but we can dream, yeah.. Okay, now everyone slap me silly…. This next few months are going to be very interesting, indeed…hee hee hee…go Browns!!! and Betty White…:)

by Poppawolf on Feb 7, 2012 12:20 AM EST reply actions  

Peyton and Flynn should not be in the same sentence. One is a HoFer, one has a good game under his belt. Each would have a very different effect if they came to Cleveland.

by Legoman0721 on Feb 10, 2012 11:33 AM EST via Android app up reply actions  

Where is the next year option on this survey? The answer is always going to be next year.

by GrillGuy on Feb 7, 2012 11:39 AM EST reply actions  

I believe that would fall into “1-3 years”.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 7, 2012 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Wow, I really shouldn’t have to explain this joke.

by GrillGuy on Feb 8, 2012 8:20 AM EST up reply actions  

He is correct…

by Legoman0721 on Feb 10, 2012 11:34 AM EST via Android app up reply actions  

Of the 17 people who voted “Never (we’re jinxed)” I request a recount because people without a heart are not competent enough to make a vote since they’re legally dead. May Joe Thomas strike a sad and painful punishment on your cable boxes so you never have the ability to watch the Browns as they bring back their dynasty years!

Honor. Courage. Commitment.

by Brownsbacker488 on Feb 8, 2012 1:04 AM EST reply actions  

RG3

I can’t wait til RG3 is in a browns uniform. He is going to bring a level of excitement this team hasn’t seen in years. If for some reason we do not get him as our qb, we will watch him go on another team and be a superstar that will haunt us for years.

Why must I be like that, Why must I chase the cat?

by rdy on Feb 9, 2012 5:56 PM EST reply actions  

Almost anything can happen in the NFL in 1-3 years. My cup is half full!

by Mal Reynolds on Feb 10, 2012 9:25 AM EST reply actions  

We need to grab RG3 now because after we win the 2012 Super Bowl we’re going to be picking last.

Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war

by Kaner on Feb 10, 2012 2:03 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

qbs

for those who think that a rg111 is the answer, remember Dan Marino first year at Miami, couldnt be touched, went 16 gm winning streak, perfect season, then the second year teams found a way to get to him and no more great qb, still good but beatable, the last two years Ive followed the Browns all the really drafted was defense, passed up Julio Jones last year, qbs cant catch the ball too or run it all the time for hurt backs, sorry, the Browns need to work on two to three wrs and a decent line

by Coltfollower on Feb 10, 2012 3:29 PM EST reply actions  

Understatement of the week.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 10, 2012 8:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Was just trying to be nice.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 9:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve read that post 10 times. It’s too funny.

by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 7:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I wish that we could get a Marino like repeat at QB here in Cleveland. It would be nice if it was Colt, due to the fact that we already have him under contract at a really good price. Is it gonna happen? Never know, but there’s always hope. We will probably pick up the QB in the next 1 to 2 drafts.

A bargain is something you don't need at a price you can't resist....
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong!
My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch!
Once you start agreeing with TDSH, you know that you're wrong.

by J. W. on Feb 10, 2012 7:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Is this some sort of football throwing robot?

You’ve done it! Why draft talent when you can just build it?

by HenryDawg on Feb 10, 2012 9:19 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Is this some sort of football throwing robot?

My abs hurt from laughing too hard

by Brownie's Year on Feb 10, 2012 9:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Fantastic.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 11, 2012 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, he’s an uppity prick.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 11, 2012 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

At least he’s not a total a**hole like R2.

"We just lost to the Steelers 20 hours ago and that still hurts. I need to get home and eat a burrito." -Phil Dawson

by Adrock2099 on Feb 11, 2012 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

RG111 is like hundreds of years in the future. This is RG3

"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." -Paul Brown

by macdowellm03 on Feb 11, 2012 9:01 PM EST up reply actions  

RG111 came here in a time machine. His mission is to destroy Andrew Luck, who has a monopoly on the Super Bowl in the future. RG111 will destroy Andrew Luck through spectacular play that usurps Luck’s glory.

Resident Tim Couch Apologist.

by Dawg Nuts on Feb 11, 2012 10:40 PM EST up reply actions  

RG 111. I feel a meme coming on.

Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war

by Kaner on Feb 10, 2012 11:26 PM EST reply actions  

RG111 > R2D2 > 3CPO

Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war

by Kaner on Feb 11, 2012 1:04 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Non-stop coverage of the team with the best fans in the NFL, the Cleveland Browns.

Community Guidelines
Send us a Scoop

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Cleveland_browns_super_bowl_banner_11217big_small
A new USFL/NFL D League?
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / @# / !@
Small
Top 5 Bubble Players
Small
All-time NFL mock draft on MtD
Buddhathomas_small
Cleveland Browns 2012 Prediction - A Sailor's Perspective
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / !^ / !@
Cribbs_small
2012 Rookie Predictions
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
A look of the 2012 Browns O-line
000_0505_small
Kardiac Assessment % / ( / !@
00000021_small
browns Q for 12 who are they

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Browns Links

Local Media Sources
Official Browns Site
Orange and Brown Report
Cleveland Plain Dealer
Akron Beacon Journal

Browns Communities/Blogs
The Watercooler
Waiting for Next Year
Dawg Scooper
Dawg Talkers
Dawg Bones
The Browns Board

free hit counter javascript


Executive Editor

Dbn_small Chris Pokorny

Minions

Funny-good-times-11_small Bernie19Kosar

Rufiohookgrin01_small rufio

Hadenward-new2_small Jon @ DBN

Moderators

N3tdgy_medium_small Brownie's Year

Polar_cap_of_mars_planet_small notthatnoise