FanPost

Draft Profile: Stephen Hill

Prior to the NFL Combine Stephen Hill was projected to be drafted in the second or third round. After the combine, he went flying up draft boards and now is predicted to go somewhere at the end of the first round. Does this Junior Wide Receiver warrant a lofty first round selection or is he another workout warrior destined to bust?

Stephen Hill - WR - Georgia Tech

2012 NFL Combine Results

Height: 6'-4" Weight: 215 lbs.

40-Yard Dash 4.36
Bench press 14
Vertical jump 39.5
Broad jump 11'1
Three-cone drill 6.88
20-yard shuttle 4.48
60-yard shuttle 11.43

College Statistics

Year Rec Yards Avg TD
2009 6 137 22.8 1
2010 15 291 19.4 3
2011 28 820 29.3 9
Career 49 1248 25.5 9
Hillx-inset-community_medium

via i.usatoday.net


Strengths

The most obvious thing about Hill is he is an athletic freak. 6'-4" 215 humans should not be able to run a 4.36 40. Some scouts even clocked him at 4.28. Hill is a legitimate deep threat from day 1. He does an excellent job of catching the ball with his hands and will go up to catch it at its highest point, and he can get high. His vertical jump was more than 5" higher than A.J. Green's last year. He is a tenacious blocker, and selflessly did it for three years on a team who ran the triple option. While that didn't give him too many opportunities to catch the football, when he did, he made the most of it, as evidenced by his average of almost 30 yards per catch last season.

Watching a highlight reel on Hill you will notice that his college QB was not very accurate. Hill does a good job of adjusting to the football, and will come back for it. He battles DBs to make catches in traffic using his large frame to shield off defenders. He can easily go over the top of any defender. He also makes some spectacular one handed catches.

He is powerful running after the catch and often employs a punishing stiff arm to abuse defenders. I believe we all enjoyed watching another big, fast, GT receiver use a punishing stiff arm. Comparisons between the two players are appropriate.

From a variety of scouting reports, he's intelligent, hard working, and a great team player.

Slideshow_1002252856_techfoot_0902_jc3_medium

via www.6magazineonline.com

Weaknesses

The most glaring weakness in Hill's game is that he was not required to run complex routes in college. However, many scouts and coaches were very impressed with the crisp and accurate routes he ran at the combine. He also has a reputation for dropping balls. He dropped about 5 balls last year and 2 in critical situations. Those are the sort of drops fans remember, which leads to a reputation. He's also not a quick receiver and lacks burst off the line. He has to build up to his top speed. He sometimes slows down when making cuts. He will have to learn how to read the defense and make route adjustments. Learning these skills is not uncommon for rookie receivers, but Hill will most likely have a steeper learning curve than most. The fact that he excelled at the combine, but has questions on the field is keeping him from being top 10 talent.

Why the Browns should draft him

One of the team's most glaring weaknesses in 2011 was an inability to stretch a defense. Teams constantly crowded the line of scrimmage and quickly stuffed runs or blew up the short passing game. While many people blame Colt McCoy's inability to throw deep, the fact is that we also don't have a legitimate deep threat receiver to scare anyone. While Hill might not be a polished #1 receiver in 2012, at the very worst he will put some fear of the deep ball into a defense and force them to account for him. Most likely we will draft Richardson or Blackmon first. If we take Richardson, and have no deep threat teams will keep 8 and 9 men in the box. If we go with Blackmon, he and Little will have a field day running the short and intermediate routes while Hill pulls the coverage away from them. Another reason to consider Hill is that our receivers are absolutely terrible blockers. I can't even remember how many times I saw us fail on a screen play because MoMass or Cribbs acted like the WR equivalent of Jon St. Clair. Screens are an undervalued play which slows the pass rush that we have not run well in years, partly because our WR blocking is so poor. Even though it may be a couple of years until Hill really becomes a dominant receiver we're not in a position to even challenge the division. We don't even know if we have a QB yet. May as well let him develop a year or two until we're truly ready to contend. Taking him at 22 is getting the ceiling of Megatron and the floor of Demaryus Thomas with a late first rounder.

Why the Browns should pass on him

The Browns have way too many holes to use a first round pick on a project WR. We already have one project receiver in Little and we need polished players who can come in and hit the ground running. He is the epitome of a boom or bust player, with the potential to be Carlton Mitchell, who can't get on the field, or Calvin Johnson, the best receiver in the league. The Browns cannot afford to take that risk. He won't be as effective in the WCO, especially with Colt at QB, because nobody is concerned about his ability to hit the deep ball. There are possibly better fits available later in the draft and we need to use the 22nd pick on a RB, RT or another position of need.

This is a fan-created post. Dawgs By Nature assumes no responsibility for the content listed.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Dawgs By Nature

You must be a member of Dawgs By Nature to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Dawgs By Nature. You should read them.

Join Dawgs By Nature

You must be a member of Dawgs By Nature to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Dawgs By Nature. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker